 apparatus and method for evaluating underground formations with selective fluid communication
专利摘要:
apparatus and method for evaluating underground formations with selective fluid communication an apparatus comprising first and second fluid inlets, a pump and a sample chamber can be positioned in a well that penetrates an underground formation. a method of using it may comprise dragging fluid from the underground formation and into the first and second fluid inlets using the pump, discharging at least a portion of the fluid entrained to the second fluid inlet, and selectively diverting at least one portion of the fluid drawn into the first fluid inlet to the sample chamber. 公开号:BR112012018101B1 申请号:R112012018101 申请日:2011-01-13 公开日:2020-04-22 发明作者:Mark Milkovisch；Alexander Zazovsky；Simon Ross 申请人:Prad Research And Development Limited； IPC主号:
专利说明:
(54) Title: APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING UNDERGROUND FORMATIONS WITH SELECTIVE FLUID COMMUNICATION (51) Int.CI .: E21B 49/08; E21B 43/00. (30) Unionist Priority: 1/20/2010 US 12 / 690,231. (73) Holder (s): PRAD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED. (72) Inventor (s): MARK MILKOVISCH; ALEXANDER ZAZOVSKY; SIMON ROSS. (86) PCT Application: PCT US2011021048 of 13/01/2011 (87) PCT Publication: WO 2011/090868 of 07/28/2011 (85) Date of Beginning of the National Phase: 20/07/2012 (57) Summary: APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING UNDERGROUND FORMATIONS WITH SELECTIVE FLUID COMMUNICATION An apparatus comprising first and second fluid inlets, a pump and a sample chamber can be positioned in a well that enters an underground formation. A method of using it may comprise dragging fluid from the underground formation and into the first and second fluid inlets using the pump, discharging at least a portion of the fluid entrained to the second fluid inlet, and selectively diverting at least one portion of the fluid drawn into the first fluid inlet to the sample chamber. APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING UNDERGROUND FORMATIONS WITH SELECTIVE FLUID COMMUNICATION BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Well holes are drilled to locate and produce hydrocarbons. A downhole drilling tool with a drill at one end of it is advanced into the ground to form a well. As the drilling tool is advanced, a drilling mud is pumped through the drilling tool and out of the drill to cool the drilling tool and remove debris and cuttings. The fluid leaves the drill and flows back to the surface for recirculation through the tool. Drilling mud is also used to form a mud cake to line the borehole. During the drilling operation, it is desirable to carry out various assessments of the formations penetrated by the well hole. In some cases, the drilling tool may be equipped with devices to test and / or sample the surrounding formation. In some cases, the drilling tool can be removed and a profiled handle tool can be implanted inside the well hole to test and / or sample the formation. In other cases, the drilling tool can be used to perform the test or sampling. These samples or tests can be used, for example, to locate the Petition 870200010040, of 01/21/2020, p. 11/18 valuable hydrocarbons. Examples of drilling tools with testing / sampling capabilities are provided in U.S. Patents US 6,871,713, US 7,234,521 and US 7,114,562. The formation assessment often requires the formation fluid to be dragged to the downhole tool for testing and / or sampling. Various devices, such as probes, are extended from the downhole tool to establish fluid communication with the formation around the downhole to drag fluid into the downhole tool. A typical probe is a circular element extended from the downhole tool and positioned against the side wall of the downhole. A rubber packer at the end of the probe is used to create a seal with the side wall of the well hole. Another device that serves to form a seal with the side wall of the well hole is referred to as a double packer. With a double packer, two elastomeric rings expand radially over the tool to isolate a portion of the borehole between them. The rings form a seal with the well hole wall and allow the fluid to be drawn into the isolated portion of the well and into an entrance to the downhole tool. The mud cake that lines the well is often useful to assist the probe and / or double packers to seal the well hole wall. Once the seal is made, the formation fluid is drawn into the downhole tool through an inlet by reducing the pressure in the downhole tool. Examples of probes and / or packers used in downhole tools are described in the North Patents American US 6,301,959; 4,860,581; 4,936,139; 6,585,045; 6,609,568; 6,719,049 and 6,964,301. The collection and sampling of underground fluids contained in formations underground are well known. In Oil exploration and recovery industries, for example, fluid samples in the formation are collected and analyzed for various purposes, such as to determine the existence, composition and / or productivity of subsurface hydrocarbon fluid reservoirs. This aspect of the recovery and exploration process can be crucial in the development of drilling strategies, and can have a significant impact on financial expenses and / or savings. To conduct the valid fluid analysis, the fluid obtained from training subsurface must have purity enough, or be virgin fluid, to represent the fluid properly contained in the training. As used in scope of the present invention, the terms virgin fluid, acceptable virgin fluid and their variations mean subsurface fluid that is pure, primitive, innate, uncontaminated or otherwise considered in the field fluid sampling and analysis to be sufficiently or acceptable representative of a given training for sampling and / or evaluation of valid hydrocarbons. Several challenges may arise in the process of obtaining virgin fluid from underground formations. Again with reference to the oil industries related, for example, the land around the borehole from which fluid samples are typically sought, contain contaminants, such as filtrate from the mud used in drilling the borehole. This material often contaminates the virgin fluid as it passes through the well bore, which results in the fluid that is generally unacceptable for sampling and / or evaluating liquid hydrocarbons. Such a fluid is referred to herein as a contaminated fluid. Because the fluid is sampled through the borehole, mud cake, cement, and / or other layers, it is difficult to avoid contamination of the fluid sample as it flows from the formation and into a downhole tool during sampling. A challenge, therefore, is to minimize the contamination of virgin fluid during the extraction of fluid from the formation. Fig. 1 shows a subsurface formation 16 penetrated by a well hole 14. A layer of mud cake 15 lines a side wall 17 of the well hole 14. Due to the invasion of the mud filtrate for formation during drilling, the well bore is surrounded by a cylindrical layer known as the invaded zone 19 containing contaminated fluid 20 which may or may not be mixed with the virgin fluid. In addition to the side wall of the well hole and the surrounding contaminated fluid, virgin fluid 22 is located in formation 16. As shown in Fig. 1, contaminants tend to be located close to the well wall in the invaded zone 19. Fig. 2 shows the typical flow patterns of the forming fluid as it passes from the subsurface formation 16 in a downhole tool 1. The downhole tool 1 is positioned adjacent to the formation and a probe 2 is extended from the downhole tool through the mud cake 15 to the side wall 17 of the well hole 14. The probe 2 is placed in fluid communication with the formation 16 so that the forming fluid can be passed to the downhole tool 1. Initially, as shown in Fig. 1, the invaded zone 19 surrounds the side wall 17 and contains contamination. As the fluid initially passes to the probe 2, the contaminated fluid 20 from the invaded zone 19 is dragged to the probe with the fluid thus generating inadequate fluid for sampling. However , as shown in Fig. 2, after in certain amount of fluid pass through gives probe 2, O fluid virgin 22 breaks and begins entering at probe. In others In other words, a more central portion of the fluid that flows into the probe gives way to the virgin fluid, while the remaining portion of the fluid is contaminated with fluid from the invasion zone. The challenge remains in adapting to the fluid flow so that fluid virgin is collected at tool in background well during sampling. The evaluation of training is usually fulfilled in fluids dragged on background tool in well. exist currently techniques for carrying out various measurements, pre-tests and / or sampling of incoming fluids in the downhole tool. Several methods and devices have been proposed to obtain subsurface fluids for sampling and evaluation. For example, US Patents US 6,230,557, 6,223,822, 4,416,152, and 3,611,799, and PCT Patent Application Publication WO 96/30628, describe certain probes and related techniques to improve sampling. However, it has been found that when the fluid passes into the well-bottom tool formation, various contaminants, such as well-hole and / or drilling mud fluids, can enter the tool with the fluids in the formation. These contaminants can affect the quality of measurements and / or samples of the formation fluids. In addition, contamination can cause costly delays in borehole operations, requiring additional time for further testing and / or sampling. In addition, these problems can generate false results that are wrong and / or unusable. Other techniques have been developed to separate virgin fluids during sampling. For example, US Patent 6,301,959 discloses a sampling probe with two hydraulic lines to recover fluids in the formation of two zones in the well bore. In this patent, well fluids are drawn into a guard zone separated from fluids drawn into a probe zone. Despite advances in such sampling, there remains a need to develop techniques for fluid sampling to optimize sample quality and the efficiency of the sampling process. To increase the quality of the sample, it is desirable that the forming fluid entering the downhole tool be sufficiently clean or virgin for the valid test. In other words, the forming fluid must have little or no contamination. Attempts have been made to eliminate contaminants from entering the downhole tool with the forming fluid. For example, as described in US Patent 4,951,749, the filters were positioned in probes to block contaminants from entering the downhole tool with the forming fluid. In addition, as shown in US Patent 6,301,959, a probe is provided with a guard ring to divert contaminated fluids away from clean fluids as it enters the probe. Techniques have also been developed to assess the fluid that passes through the tool to determine contamination levels. In some cases, mathematical techniques and models have been developed to predict contamination by a molten flow line. See, for example, International PCT Patent Application WO 2005065277 and PCT Patent Application 00/50876, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Techniques for predicting contamination levels and determining cleaning times are described in P.S. Hammond, One or Two Phased Flow During fluid Sampling by a Wireline Too Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 6, p. 299-330 (1991), the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Hammond describes a semi-empirical technique for estimating contamination levels and cleaning time of the passage of fluid that passes inside a downhole tool through a single flow line. Despite the existence of techniques for conducting training assessment and attempting to deal with contamination, there remains a need to manipulate the flow of fluids through the downhole tool to reduce contamination when it enters and / or passes through the downhole tool. It is desirable that such techniques are able to divert contaminants away from the clean fluid. Techniques have also been developed for monitoring contamination. However, such techniques concern unique flow line applications. It is desirable to provide contamination monitoring techniques applicable to operations of multiple flow lines. It is still desirable that the techniques are capable of one or more of the following, among others: analysis of the fluid that passes through the flow lines, selective handling of the fluid flow through the downhole tool, in response to the detected contamination , removal of contamination, providing flexibility in handling fluids in the downhole tool, selective collection of virgin fluid in addition to the contaminated fluid; separation of virgin fluid from contaminated fluid; optimization of the quantity and / or quality of virgin fluid extracted from the sampling formation; adjusting the fluid flow according to the sampling needs; control of the sampling operation manually and / or automatically and / or on a real-time basis, analysis of fluid flow to detect contamination levels, estimation of time to clean up contamination, calibration of flow line measurements, line measurements cross-check flow, selectively combining and / or separating flow lines, determining contamination levels, and comparing flow line data to known values. Finally, it is desirable that techniques are developed to adjust the operation of the well to optimize the testing and / or sampling process. In some cases, such optimization can be in response to real-time measurements, operating commands, pre-programmed instructions and / or other factors. To this end, aspects of the present invention are aimed at optimizing the training evaluation process. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The present invention is best understood from the following detailed description when dealing with the accompanying figures. It should be noted that, according to industry standard practice, several characteristics are not drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of the various characteristics can be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of the discussion. Fig. 1 is a schematic view of an underground formation penetrated by a well bore lined with mud cake, which describes the virgin fluid in the subsurface formation. Fig. 2 is a schematic view of a downhole tool positioned in the downhole with a probe extending into the formation, which describes the flow of contaminated and virgin fluid in a downhole sampling tool. Fig. 3 is a schematic view of the downhole profiling cable tool having a fluid sampling device. Fig. 4 is a schematic view of a downhole drilling tool with an alternative embodiment of the fluid sampling device of Fig. 3. Fig. 5 is a detailed view of the fluid sampling device of Fig. 3 which describes an inlet section and a fluid flow section. Fig. 6A is a detailed view of the inlet section of Fig. 5 which describes the flow of fluid into a probe that has a wall that defines an inner channel, the recessed wall for the probe. Fig. 6B is an alternative embodiment of the probe of Fig. 6A having a wall that defines an inner channel, the wall flush with the probe. Fig. 60 is an alternative embodiment of the probe of Fig. 6A having a dimensioner capable of reducing the size of the inner channel. Fig. 6D is a cross-sectional view of the probe in Fig. 6C. Fig. 6E is an alternative embodiment of the probe of Fig. 6A having a dimensioner capable of increasing the size of the inner channel. THE Fig. 6F is seen in section transversal gives probe of Fig. 6E. THE Fig. 6G is alternative modality of probe Fig. 6A by having one pivotadr that adjusts the position of channel inland to the probe.THE Fig. 6H is seen in section transversal gives probe of Fig. 6G. Fig. 61 is an alternative embodiment of the probe of Fig. 6A having a modeler that fits the shape of the probe and / or the inner channel. Fig. 6J is a cross-sectional view of the probe in Fig. 61. Fig. 7A is a schematic view of the probe of Fig. 6A with the flow of fluid from the formation to the probe with the pressure and / or flow rate balanced between the inner and outer flow channels for the substantially linear flow within the probe. . Fig. 7B is a schematic view of the probe of Fig. 7A with the flow rate of the inner channel greater than the flow rate of the outer channel. Fig. 8A is a schematic view of an alternative embodiment of the downhole tool and fluid system that flows having double walls and packers. Fig. 8B is a schematic view of the downhole tool of Fig. 8A with the walls moved together in response to changes in fluid flow. Fig. 8C is a schematic view of the flow section of the downhole tool of Fig. 8Ά. Fig. 9 is a schematic view of the fluid sampling device of Fig. 5 has flow lines with individual pumps. Fig. 10 is a graphical representation of the optical density signatures of the fluid entering the probe at a given volume. Fig. 11A is a graphical representation of the optical density signatures of Fig. 10 deviated during sampling at a given volume. Fig. 11B is a graphical representation of the ratio between the flow rates corresponding to the volume given for the optical densities of Fig. 11A. Fig. 12 is a schematic view, partly in cross-section of the rock bottom assessment tool positioned in an adjacent underground formation. Fig. 13 is a schematic view of a portion of the downhole formation assessment tool of Fig. 12 that describes a fluid flow system for receiving fluid from the adjacent formation. Fig. 14 is a detailed schematic view of the downhole tool and fluid flow system of Fig. 13. Fig. 15A is a graph of a fluid property of the flow lines of the fluid flow system of Fig. 14 using a flow stabilization technique. Fig. 15B is a graph of derivatives of functions owned by Fig. 15A. Fig. 16 is a graph of a fluid property of the flow lines of the fluid flow system of Fig. 14 using a projection technique. Fig. 17 is a graph describing the contamination models for merged and separated flow line lines. Fig. 18 is a graph of a fluid property of the flow lines of the fluid flow system of Fig. 14 using a time estimation technique. Fig. 19 is the graph that describes the relationship between percentage contamination for a flow line assessment versus a combined flow line. Fig. 20 is a schematic view of a well location having a platform with a downhole tool suspended in it and in an underground formation. Fig. 21 is a flow diagram that describes a method of assessing an underground formation through a downhole tool according to a tool configuration, the method involves adjustments of the defined tool. Figs. 22A and 22B are schematic views of an apparatus according to one or more aspects of the present invention; and Fig. 23 is a flow diagram of at least a portion of a method according to one or more aspects of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION It should be understood that the following description provides many different modalities, or examples, for implementing different characteristics of various modalities. Specific examples of components and devices are described below to simplify the present description. These are, of course, only examples and are not intended to be limiting. In addition, the present description may repeat letters and / or reference numerals in several examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various modalities and / or configurations discussed. In addition, the formation of a first feature on, or a second feature in the description that follows may include modalities in which the first and second features are formed in direct contact, and may also include modalities in which additional features can be formed interposing the first and second features, such that the first and second features may not be in direct contact. With reference to Fig. 3, an example of an environment in which aspects of the present invention can be used is shown. In the illustrated example, a downhole tool 10 such as a Modular Formation Dynamics Tester (MDT) is provided by Schlumberger Corporation, and further described, for example, in US Patents US 4,936,139 and 4,860,581, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The downhole tool 10 is detachable in the well hole 14 and suspended there with a conventional profiling field 18, or conventional conductor or pipe or coiled pipe, below a platform 5, as will be appreciated by one skilled in the art. The illustrated tool 10 is provided with various modules and / or components 12, including, but not limited to, a fluid sampling device 26 used to obtain fluid samples from the subsurface formation 16. The fluid sampling device 26 is provided with a probe 28 extendable through the mud cake 15 and the side wall 17 of the borehole well 14 for sampling. The samples are dragged to the downhole tool 10, using probe 28. Although Fig. 3 represents a modular profiling cable sampling tool for sampling according to one or more aspects of the present invention, it will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that such a system can be used in any bottom tool. well. For example, Fig. 4 shows an alternative downhole tool 10a having a sampling fluid system 26a therein. In this example, the downhole tool 10a is a drilling tool, including a drill column 29 and a drill 30. The drilling tool in well 10a can be of a variety of drilling tools, such as a Measument While -Drilling- (MWD) (measurement during drilling), Logging-While Drilling (LWD) (profiling during drilling) or other drilling system. The tools 10 and 10a of Figs. 3 and 4, respectively, may have alternative configurations, such as modular, unitary, profile cable, coiled, autonomous, drilling and other variations of tools at the bottom of the well. With reference to Fig. 5, the fluid sampling system 26 of Fig. 3 is shown in greater detail. The sampling system 26 includes an inlet section 25 and a flow section 27 for selectively dragging fluid to the desired portion of the downhole tool. The inlet section 25 includes a probe 28 mounted on an extendable base 30 having a seal 31, such as a packer, to seal the well hole wall 17 around the probe 28 in a sealable manner. The inlet section 25 is selective extendable shape of the downhole tool 10 through extension pistons 33. Probe 28 is provided with an inner channel 32 and an outer channel 34 separated by wall 36. Wall 36 is preferably concentric with probe 28. However , the probe geometry and the corresponding wall can be of any geometry. In addition, one or more walls 36 can be used in various configurations for the probe. Flow section 27 includes flow lines 38 and 40 driven by one or more pumps 35. A first flow line 38 is in fluid communication with the inner channel 32, and a second flow line 40 is in fluid communication with the outer channel 34. The flow section illustrated can include one or more flow control devices, such as pump 35 and valves 44, 45, 47 and 49 shown in Fig. 5, to selectively drag fluid across several portions of flow section 27. The fluid is entrained from the formation through the inner and outer channels and within their corresponding flow lines. Preferably, the contaminated fluid can be passed from the formation through the outer channel 34, to the flow line 40 and discharged into the well bore 14. Preferably, the fluid passes from the formation to the inner channel 32, through the flow line 38 and , is diverted to one or more sample chambers 42, or discharged into the well bore. Once it is determined that the fluid passing in flow line 38 is virgin fluid, a valve 44 and / or 49 can be activated using control techniques known as manual and / or automatic operation to divert fluid to the sample chamber . The fluid sampling system 26 is also preferably provided with one or more fluid monitoring systems 53 to analyze the fluid entering the probe 28. The fluid monitoring system 53 can be provided from various monitoring devices, such as optical fluid analyzers, as will be discussed more fully here. The details of the various arrangements and components of the fluid sampling system 26 described above, as well as alternative arrangements and components for the system 26 are known to those skilled in the art and found in several other patents and printed publications, for example, as discussed herein. . In addition, the particular arrangement and components of the downhole fluid sampling system 26 may vary depending on factors in each particular project, use or situation, Thus, neither system 26 nor the present invention is limited to the above arrangements described and the components and may include any suitable components and arrangement. For example, the various flow lines, pump placement and valves can be adjusted to provide a variety of configurations. Likewise, the arrangement and components of the downhole tool 10 may vary depending on factors in each particular project, or use, situation. The above description of the exemplary components and environments of the tool 10 with which the fluid sampling device 26 of the present invention can be used is provided for illustrative purposes only and is not limited to the present invention. With continued reference to FIG. 5, the fluid flow pattern that passes to the downhole tool 10 is illustrated. Initially, as shown in Fig. 1, an invaded zone 19 surrounds the wall of the well hole 17. The virgin fluid 22 is located in the formation 16 behind the invaded zone 19. At some point during the process, as the fluid is extracted from formation 16 on probe 28, the virgin fluid ruptures and enters probe 28, as shown in Fig. 5. As the fluid flows into the probe, the contaminated fluid 22 in the invaded zone 19 near the inner channel 32 eventually it is removed and gives rise to virgin fluid 22. Thus, only virgin fluid 22 is drawn into inner channel 32, while contaminated fluid 20 flows into outer channel 34 of probe 28. To allow for this result, flow patterns, pressures and probe dimensions can be changed to achieve the desired flow path, as will be described more fully here. With reference to Figs. 6A-6J, various modalities of probe 28 are shown in greater detail. In Fig. 6A, the base 30 is shown supporting the seal 31 in the sealing engagement with the well hole wall 17. The probe 28 preferably extends beyond the seal 31 and penetrates the mud cake 15. The probe 28 is placed in fluid communication with the formation 16. The wall 36 preferably has a recess at a distance for the probe 28. In this configuration, the pressure along the forming wall is automatically equalized in the inner and outer channels. Probe 28 and wall 36 are preferably concentric circles, but can be of alternating geometry, depending on the application or the need for the operation. Additional walls, channels and / or flow lines can be incorporated in various configurations to further optimize sampling. L0 The wall 36 is preferably adjustable to optimize the flow of virgin fluid in the probe. Due to variations in flow conditions, it is desirable to adjust the position of the wall 36 so that the maximum amount of virgin fluid can be collected with the greatest efficiency. For example, wall 36 can be moved or adjusted to various depths relative to probe 28. As shown in Fig. 6B, wall 36 can be positioned flush with the probe. In this configuration, the pressure inside the channel along the formation can be different from the pressure in the outside channel along the formation. With reference to Figs. 6C-6H, wall 36 is preferably capable of varying the size and / or elevation of inner channel 32. As shown in Fig. 6C to 6F, the diameter of a portion or the entire wall 36 is preferably adjustable to align with the flow of contaminated fluid 20 from the invaded zone 19 and / or virgin fluid 22 from formation 16 in probe 28. The wall 36 can be provided with a nozzle 41 and a guide 40 adapted to allow for the selective modification of the size and / or dimension the inner channel. The nozzle 41 is selectively movable between an expanded and collapsed position, moving the guide 40 along the wall 36. In Figs. 6C and 6D, the guide 40 is surrounding the nozzle 41 and holds it in the collapsed position to reduce the size of the inner flow channel in response to a narrower flow of virgin fluid 22. In Figs. 6E and 6F, the guide 41 is retracted so that the nozzle 41 is expanded to increase the size of the inner flow channel in response to a wider flow of virgin fluid 22. 15 the nozzle shown in Figs. 6C-6F can be a bent metal spring, a cylindrical bellows, a metal energized elastomer, a sealant, or any other device capable of selectively expanding or extending the wall, as desired. Another 20 devices capable of expanding the cross-sectional area of wall 36 can be viewed. For example, an expandable spring cylinder fixed at one end can also be used. As shown in Figs. 6G and 6H, probe 28 can also be provided with a wall 36a having a first portion 42, a second portion 43 and a sealing bearing 45 between them to allow for selective adjustment of the orientation, the probe. The second portion 43 and the wall 36a for the sonua. desirably mobile an optimal alignment In addition, inside the probe 28 to locate with the virgin fluid flow 20. as shown in Figs. 61 and 6J, one or more modelers 44 can also be provided to conform to probe 28 and / or wall 36 in a desired mold. Modelers 44 have two more fingers 50 adapted to apply force to make modeler wall 36 of the nozzle with which various positions on the probe the mold deform. When they are extended, as shown in the and / or probe wall 40 or Fig. 6E, can be extended over at least one to selectively deform ί -> / 4-1 Qo Η ed »mo όθ 1 a. It hurts θ s desired shape. If aesejauu, to various positions around the probe and / or generate the desired mold. dimensioner, pivot and / or portion the nozzle apply to the pressure on the modeler wall can be any electronic mechanism capable of selectively moving the wall 36 as provided here. One or more devices can be used to make one or more of the adjustments. Such devices may include a selectably controllable sliding collar, a pleated tube, or cylindrical column or bellows, an elastomeric ring with embedded metal fingers on the column, an elastomeric firing tube, a column cylinder, and / or any suitable components with any suitable capacities and operation can be used to provide some desired variability. These and other adjusting devices can be used to change channels for fluid flow. Thus, a variety of configurations can be generated by combining one or more of the adjustable features. Now referring to Figs. 7A and 7B, flow characteristics are shown in greater detail. Various flow characteristics of probe 28 can be adjusted. For example, as shown in Fig. 7A, probe 28 can be designed to allow controlled flow separation of virgin fluid 22 within inner channel 32 and contaminated fluid 20 within outer channel 34. This may be desirable, for example, to help minimize the sampling time required before the acceptable virgin fluid is flowing into the inner channel 32 and / or to optimize or increase the amount of virgin fluid flowing into the inner channel 32, or for other reasons. The ratio of fluid flow rates within the inner channel 32 and the outer channel 34 can be varied to optimize, or increase, the volume of virgin fluid drawn into the inner channel 32 as the amount of contaminated fluid 20 and / or virgin wherein fluid 22 changes over time. The diameter d of the area flowing into the virgin probe can increase or decrease fluid depending on the well and / or formation conditions. Whenever the diameter d expands, it is desirable to increase interior. This can be done by the amount of flow in the channel by changing the wall 36, as previously described. Alternatively, or simultaneously, the flow rates for the respective channels can be changed to further increase the flow of virgin fluid into the inner channel. The comparative flow rate within channels 32 and 34 of probe 28 can be represented by a flow rate ratio Q1 / Q 2 . The flow rate for the inner channel 32 is represented by Q1 and the flow rate for the outer channel 34 is represented by Q 2 . The flow rate Qx in the inner channel 32 can be selectively increased and / or the flow rate Q 2 in the outer channel 34 can be decreased to allow more fluid to be drawn into the inner channel 32. Alternatively, the flow rate Qx in the inner channel 32 can be selectively reduced and / or the flow rate (Q 2 ) in the outer channel 34 can be increased to allow less fluid to be drawn into the inner channel 32. As shown in Fig. 7A, Qx and Q 2 represent the flow of fluid through probe 28. The flow of fluid to the inner channel can be changed by increasing or decreasing the flow rate to inner channel 32 and / or outer channel 34. For example, as shown in Fig. 7B, the flow of fluid into the inner channel can flow rate Qi through being increased by increasing the inner channel 32, and / or decreasing the flow rate Q 2 through the channel exterior 34. As indicated by the sections, the change in the Q1 / Q 2 ratio directs a greater amount of fluid into the inner channel 32 and increases the amount of fluid to the downhole tool (Fig. 5). dragged virgin One or more flow rates within channels 32 and 34 may be desirable in any way selectively controllable with any suitable component (s). For example, which is in flow control devices fluid communication with each flow line 38, dos can be respective activated to adjust the flow of fluid within channels (Fig. 5). Flow control 35 and ο ο ο d! s θ i acc io.nado θγω. and 49 of the present example can, if desired, a real time base channels 32 and 34, during The fluid flow rate and optimize valve tool 45, 47 to modify the flow rates in the production and sampling. can be changed to affect the flow of incoming virgin fluid to the bottom of the well. Various devices can be used to measure and adjust rates to optimize fluid flow to the tool. Unlawfully, it may be desirable to have increased flow within the outer channel when the amount of contaminated fluid is high and then adjust the flow rate to increase the flow into the inner channel once the amount of virgin fluid entering the probe increases. In this way, fluid sampling can be manipulated to increase the efficiency of the sampling process and the quality of the sample. With reference to Figs. 8A and 8B, another embodiment of the present invention employing sampling 26b is shown. To a downhole tool fluid system 10b is implanted inside the well hole 14 in spiral tubing extending from the bottom of the well mud hole 58. Double packers 60 se 10b and sealingly engage the side wall of the well 14. The hole of the well 14 is aligned with and surrounded by an invaded zone 19. A pair of crooked walls or cylindrical rings 36b is preferably positioned from the rest of the well hole between the 60 packers for insulation 14. The packer 60 can be any device capable of sealing the probe from exposure to the borehole, such as packers or any other suitable device. to separate extracted fluid The walls 36b are capable of forming 16 in at least two flow channels 32b and 34b. Tool 10b includes a body 64 having at least one fluid inlet 68 in fluid communication with the fluid in the well bore between Walls 36b are packers 60. As indicated by the arrows, positioned on the body 64. axially movable along the tool. walls 36b are between walls 36 The inlets positioned preferentially capture virgin fluid 22, while the inlets outside the walls 36 preferentially creep into the contaminated fluid 20. The walls 36b are desirably adjustable to optimize the sampling process. The mold and orientation of selectively varied to alter walls 36b may be the sampling region. The distance between the walls 36b and the hole-shaped wall 17, can be varied, selective to extend and retract the walls as per body 64. The position of the walls 36b from the body 64. The position of the walls 6b can be along the body 64 can be moved away to increase the number of inlets 68 which or moved together to reduce the receive virgin fluid, number of inlets want to receive virgin fluid, depending on the characteristics of the formation flow. The walls 36b can also be centered on a certain position along the tool 10b and / or a portion of the well hole bore 14 to align certain inlets 68 with the flow of virgin fluid into the well bore 14 between the packers 60 . The position of the movement of the walls along the body may or may not cause the walls to pass over the entrances. In some modalities, the entries can be positioned in specific regions on the body. In this case, the movement of the walls along the body can redirect flow within a given area between the packers without having to pass over the entrance. The size of the sampling region between the walls 36b can be selectively adjusted between any number of desirable positions, or within any desirable range, using any suitable component (s) and technique (s). An example of a flow system for selectively dragging fluid to the downhole tool is shown in Fig. 8C. A fluid flow line 70 extends from each entry 68 in the well-bottom tool 10b and has a corresponding valve 72 for selectively diverting fluid, either to a sample chamber 75 or into the well bore out of packers 60. Orna or more pumps 35 can be used in coordination with valves 72 to selectively drag fluid at various rates to control fluid flow to the downhole tool. The contaminated fluid is preferably dispersed back to the well bore. However, when it is determined that the virgin fluid is entering a given inlet, a valve 72 that corresponds to release the virgin fluid to the inlet can be activated into a sample chamber 75. Various measuring devices, such as an OFA 59, dragged to the tool can be used. When to evaluate the fluid multiple inlets are activated to increase the used, the specific inlet may be, central flow of virgin fluid, flow closer to the center flow closest to the contaminated region can while inlets be decreased to efficiently target the most well concentration high levels of virgin fluid for sampling. One or more probes 28 for the tool as described in the background of either Figs. 3-6J can also be used in combination with probes 28b of Figs. 8A or 8B. . x τη · ~ q rhiit * τ3. view of Referring to Fig. 9, fluid sampling 26 flow lines 38 and 40 selectively dragging from probe 28. the system in Fig. 5 is shown. They do not have a pump Fig. 9, for fluid into channels 32 The fluid monitoring system 53 of Fig. those shown in greater detail in Fig. 9. Flow lines and 40 each pass through the monitoring of fluid system 53 for analysis therein. The fluid monitoring system 53 is provided with an optical fluid analyzer 73 for measuring optical density in flow line 40 and an optical fluid analyzer for measuring optical density in flow line 38. optical fluid analyzer can be Both patents a device such as the analyzer described in North which Although at IR 6 and / or US 4,994,671 levels, Americanas US 6.1 / 8.bio and / uu the system being incorporated by reference here. fluid monitoring unit 53 of Fig. whether represented as having an optical fluid analyzer for fluid monitoring, monitoring devices will be appreciated that other fluids, such as indicators, gauges, sensors and / or other measurements or equipment that are incorporated for evaluation, can be used to determine various fluid properties such as temperature, pressure, composition, contamination other parameters known to those skilled in the MD controller 76 is preferably provided to the analyzer (s) of optical fluid take information from and send signals in response thereto for changing the flow fluid to the inner channel 32 and / or outer channel 34 of the probe 28. As represented in the Fig. 9, the controller does 53, however, of fluid part of the monitoring system will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that the controller may be located in other parts of the downhole tool and / or surface system for operation of various components in the downhole system. The controller is capable of carrying out various operations throughout the well bore system. For example, the controller is able to activate various devices for the downhole tool, such as selectively activating the dimensioning probe device, shaping pivot, and / or other probe device to change the fluid flow to the channels inner and / or outer 32, 34 of the probe. The controller can be used to selectively activate pumps 35 and / or valves 44, 45, 47, 49 to control the flow rate within channels 32, 34, selectively activate pumps 35 and / or valves 44, 45, 47, 49 to drag the fluid into the sample chamber (s) and / or discharge fluid into the well bore, to collect and / or transmit the data for uphole analysis and other functions to assist the operation of the sampling process. The controller can also be used to control the fluid extracted from the formation, provide accurate contamination parameter values useful in a contamination monitoring model, add security in determining when the extracted fluid is sufficient virgin fluid for sampling, allow collection of improved quality fluid for sampling, reducing the time required to achieve any of the above, or any combination thereof. However, the contamination monitoring calibration capability can be used for any other suitable purpose (s). Furthermore, the use (s) of, or reasons for using, a contamination monitoring calibration capability are not limited by the present invention. An example of optical density signatures (OD) of optical fluids 72 and 74 of Fig. generated by the analyzers is shown in Fig. 10. Fig. 10 shows the relationship between DO and the total volume V of fluid as it passes inside the inner and outer channels of the probe. The OD of the fluid flowing through the inner channel 32 is represented by line 80. The OD of the fluid flowing through the outer channel is represented as line 82. The resulting signatures represented by lines 80 and can be used to measure future measurements. fluid flowing in Initially, the OD of the channels is in OD m f. OD m f represents the OD of the contaminated fluid adjacent to the well bore, as shown in Fig. 1 · Once the volume of fluid entering the inner channel reaches the virgin fluid it breaks. The OD of the fluid entering the channels increases as the amount of virgin fluid entering the channels increases. Na the virgin fluid enters the inner channel 32, as The DO of the fluid entering the inner channel increases until it reaches a second level in V 2 represented by OD V. Although the virgin fluid also enters the outer channel 34, most of the contaminated fluid also continues to enter the channel outside. THE OD of the fluid at the outer channel as represented through the line 82, per therefore, increases, but typically not reaches the OD V f because presence in contaminants. The identification of virgin fluid and fluid flow in the inner and outer channels is previously described in relation to Fig. 2. The distinctive signature of the OD on the internal channel can be used to verify the monitoring system or its device. For example, the parameter OD vf , which characterizes the optical density of the virgin fluid, can be determined. This parameter can be used as a reference for monitoring contamination. The data generated from the fluid monitoring system can then be used for analytical purposes and as a basis for decision making, during the sampling process. By monitoring the color generated in various optical channels of the fluid monitoring system 53 relative to curve 80, it is possible to determine which optical channel (s) provides the optimum contrast reading for OD optical densities mf and OD vf . These optical channels can then be selected for contamination monitoring purposes. Figs. HA and 11B show the relationship between DO and the fluid flow rate to the probe. Fig. HA shows the OD signatures in Fig. 10 that were adjusted during sampling. As in Fig. 10, line 80 shows the DO signature of the fluid entering the inner channel 32, and 82 shows the DO signature of the fluid entering the outer channel 34. However, Fig. HA still shows the evolution of OD in volumes V 3 , V 4 and V 5 , during the sampling process. L0 to rig. 11B shows the relationship between the ratio of flow rates Q1 / Q2 to the volume of fluid entering the probe. As shown in Fig. 7A, Qi refers to the flow rate into the inner channel 32, and Q 2 refers to the flow rate into the outer channel 34 of probe 28. Initially, as mathematically represented by line 84 of Fig. HB, the flow rate Q1 / Q2 is at a given level (Qi / Q 2 ) that corresponds to the flow rate of Fig. 7A. However, the Q1 / Q2 ratio can then be gradually increased, as described in relation to Fig. 7B, so that the Q1 / Q2 ratio increases. This gradual increase in the flow ratio is mathematically represented as the line 84 increases to the level (Qi / Q 2 ) n in a given volume, such as V 4 . As shown in Fig. HB, the ratio can be further increased up to V5. As the flow rate increases, the corresponding OD of the inner channel 32 represented by lines 80 moves to offset 81, and the OD of outer channel 34 represented by line 82 moves to offset 83 and 85. The displacements in the flow rate illustrated in Fig. HB correspond to changes in the DO illustrated in Fig. HA for volumes from V x to V 5 . An increase in the flow rate ratio in V 3 (Fig. 11B) shifts the DO of the fluid flowing into the outer channel from its expected path 82 to a deviation 83 (Fig. 11B). An additional increase in the ratio, as represented through the line 84 in v 4 (Fig. 11A), cause one displacement at OD gives line 80 starting your level in OD V f reference for one Detour 81 (Fig . 11B) . 0 deviation from OD line 81 in V 4 causes the OD of line 80 to return to its reference level OD vf in V 5 , while the OD of deviation 83 falls further from deviation 85. Additional adjustments to OD and / or reason can be done to change the flow characteristics of the sampling process. Fig. 12 represents a conventional profiling cable tool 110 with a probe 118 and a fluid flow system. In Fig. 12, tool 110 is implanted from a platform 112 into well bore 114 through a profiling cable 116 and positioned adjacent to a formation F1. The downhole tool 110 with the probe 118 is adapted to seal with the well hole wall and drag the formation fluid to the downhole tool. Dual packers 121 are also described to demonstrate that the various fluid communication devices, such as probes and / or packers, can be used to drag the fluid into the downhole tool. Return pistons 119 help push the downhole tool and probe against the well wall. Fig. 13 is a schematic view of a portion of the downhole tool 110 of Fig. 12 depicting a fluid flow system 134. Probe 118 is preferably extended from the downhole tool for coupling to the well wall. . The probe is supplied with a 120 packer for sealing with the well wall. The packers contact the well wall and form a seal with the mud pie forage 122 from the well hole. The mud cake infiltrates the well hole wall and creates an invaded area 124 over the well hole. The invaded zone contains mud and other well-hole fluids that contaminate the surrounding formations, including the F1 formation and a portion of the clean formation fluid 126 contained therein. Probe 118 is preferably provided with at least two flow lines, an evaluation flow line 128 and a cleaning flow line 130. It will be appreciated that, in cases where dual packers are used, inlets can be provided between the same to drag the fluid into the line of assessment and cleaning flows from the downhole tool. Examples of fluid communication devices, such as probes and double packers, used to draw fluid into the separate flow lines are shown in Figs. 1, 2 and 9 above and in US Patents US 6,719,049 and US 6,301,959. The evaluation flow line extends to the downhole tool and is used to pass clean forming fluid to the downhole tool for testing and / or sampling. The evaluation flow line extends to a sample chamber 135 for collecting samples of forming liquid. The cleaning flow line 130 extends to the downhole tool and is used to drag the contaminated fluid away from the clean fluid flowing into the evaluation flow line. The contaminated fluid can be poured into the well bore through an outlet port 137. One or more pumps 136 can be used to drag the fluid through the flow lines. A divider or barrier is preferably positioned between the evaluation and cleaning flow lines to separate the fluid flowing therein. Referring to Fig. 14, the fluid flow system 134 of Fig. 13 is shown in greater detail. In this figure, the fluid is drawn into the evaluation and cleaning flow lines using probe 118. As the fluid flows into the tool, the contaminated fluid in invaded zone 5 (Fig. 13) breaks so that the clean fluid 126 can enter the evaluation flow line 128 (Fig. 14). The contaminated fluid is drawn into the cleaning line and away from the evaluation flow line as shown by the arrows. Fig. 14 shows the probe as having a cleaning flow line that forms a ring around the surface of the probe. However, it will be appreciated that other schemes of one or more inlets and flow lines that extend through the probe can be used. The evaluation and cleaning flow lines 128, 15 130 extend from the probe 118 and through the fluid flow system 134 of the downhole tool. The evaluation and cleaning flow lines are in selective fluid communication with the flow lines extending through the fluid flow system, as further described here. The fluid flow system of Fig. 14 includes a variety of features for handling clean and / or contaminated fluid flow as it passes from an upstream location, close to formation to a downstream location through the rock bottom. The system is provided with a variety of fluid measurement and / or handling devices, such as flow lines (128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 135), pumps 136, pre-test pistons 140, chambers sample 142, 5 valves 144, fluid connectors (148, 151) and sensors (138, 146). The system can also be provided with a variety of additional devices, such as restrictors, diverters, processors and other devices for handling flow and / or performing various training assessment operations. The evaluation flow line 128 extends from the probe 118 and connects fluidly to the flow lines that extend through the downhole tool. The evaluation flow line 128 is preferably provided with a pretest piston 140a and sensors, such as pressure gauge 138a and a fluid analyzer 146a. The cleaning flow line 130 extends from the probe 118 and connects fluidly to the flow lines that extend through the downhole tool. The cleaning flow line 130 20 is preferably provided with a pretest piston 140b and sensors, such as a pressure gauge 138b and a fluid analyzer 146b. Sensors, such as pressure calibrator 138a, can be connected to the evaluation and cleaning flow lines 128 and 130 to measure parameters between them, such as differential pressure. Such sensors can be located in other positions along any of the flow lines of the fluid flow system, as desired. One or more pre-test pistons can be provided to drag the fluid onto the tool and perform a pre-test operation. Pre-tests are typically performed to generate a trace of the pressure from the lowering pressure and the accumulation of flow lines as the fluid is dragged to the downhole tool through the probe. When used in combination with a probe having an evaluation and cleaning flow line, the pre-test piston can be positioned along each flow line to generate formation curves. These curves can be compared and analyzed. In addition, pre-test pistons can be used to drag fluid into the tool to break the mud cake along the well hole wall. The pistons can be cycled synchronously or at different rates to align and / or create differential pressures through the respective flow lines. Pre-test pistons can also be used to diagnose and / or detect problems during operation. Whenever the pistons are cycled at different rates, the integrity of the insulation between the lines can be determined. When the change in pressure across a flow line is reflected in a second flow line, there may be an indication that insufficient insulation exists between the flow lines. The lack of insulation between the flow lines can indicate that an insufficient seal exists between the flow lines. Pressure readings across the flow lines during piston cycling can be used to assist in diagnosing problems, or in checking for sufficient operability. The fluid flow system can be provided with fluid connectors, such as crossing 148 and / or junction 151, for the passage of fluid between the evaluation and cleaning flow lines (and / or other flow lines connected by fluid to them). These devices can be positioned at various locations throughout the fluid flow system to divert fluid flow from one or more flow lines to the desired components or portions of the downhole tool. As shown in Fig . 14, a rotary crossover 148 can be used to fluidly connect the evaluation flow line 128 with flow line 132, and the cleaning flow line 130 with flow line 129. In other words, the flow nail fluid can be selectively diverted between the various flow lines as desired. For example, the fluid can be diverted from flow line 128 to circuit 150b, and the fluid can be diverted from flow line 130 to flow circuit 150a. The junction 151 is shown in Fig. 14 as containing a number of valves 144a, b, c, d, x and connectors associated flu lines 152 and 154. The valve 144a allows fluid to pass from the flow line 129 to connecting flow line 154 and / or through flow line 131 to flow circuit 150a. Valve 144b allows fluid to pass from flow line 132 to connecting flow line 154 and / or through flow line 135 to flow circuit 150b. Valve 144c allows fluid to flow between flow lines 129, 132 upstream of valves 144a and 144b. Valve 144d allows fluid to flow between flow lines 131, 135 downstream of valves 144a and 144b. This configuration allows the selective mixing of fluid between the evaluation and cleaning flow lines. This can be used, for example, to selectively pass fluid from the flow lines to one or both sampling circuits 150a, b. Valves 144a and 144b can also be used as isolation valves to isolate fluid in flow lines 129, 132 from the rest of the fluid flow system located downstream of valves 144a, b. The isolation valves are closed to isolate a fixed volume of fluid inside the downhole tool (ie, in the flow lines between the formation and the valves 14a, b). The fixed volume located upstream of the valve 144a and / or 144b is used to perform well bottom measurements, such as pressure and mobility. In some cases, it is desirable to maintain the separation between the assessment and cleaning flow lines, for example, during sampling. This can be achieved, for example, by closing valves 144c and / or 144d to prevent fluid from passing between flow lines 129 and 132, or 131 and 135. In other cases, fluid communication between flow lines may be desirable to perform rock bottom measurements, such as formation pressure and / or mobility estimates. This can be achieved, for example, by closing valves 144a, b, opening valves 144c and / or 144d to allow fluid to flow through flow lines 129 and 132 or 131 and 135, respectively. As the fluid flows into the flow lines, the pressure gauges positioned along the flow lines can be used to measure pressure and determine the change in volume and flow area at the interface between the probe and the formation wall. This information can be used to generate mobility training. Valves 144c, d can also be used for differential to allow fluid to pass between the flow lines to the downhole tool to prevent pressure between the flow lines. In the absence of such a valve, pressure differentials between the flow lines can cause the fluid to flow from one flow line, through the formation and back to another flow line in the downhole tool, which you can change measurements, such as mobility and pressure. Junction 151 can also be used to isolate portions of the fluid flow system downstream from a portion of the fluid flow system upstream thereof. For example, the junction 151 (that is, by closing the valves 144a, b) can be used to pass fluid from a position upstream of the joint to other portions of the downhole tool, for example, through flow 125 avoiding the valve 144 j and so line the fluid flow circuits. In another example, closing the valves 144a, b, and opening of valve d, this configuration can be used to allow passage of fluid circuits 150 and / or other fluid between parts of the downhole tool through the flow line 139. This configuration 144k valve can also be used to allow fluid to pass between other components and fluid flow circuits without being in fluid communication with the probe. This can be useful in cases, for example, where there are additional components, such as additional probes and / or fluid circuit modules, downstream of the junction. open valves. junction 151 can also be operated so that 144c 144a and 144d are closed at 144b In this configuration, fluid from both flow lines can be passed from a position upstream of junction 151 to flow line 135. Alternatively, valves 144b and 144d can be closed and 144a and 144c are open so that fluid from both flow lines can be passed from a position upstream of junction 151 to flow line 131. Flow circuits 150a and 150b (sometimes referred to as sampling or fluid circuits) preferably contain pumps 136, sample chambers 142, valves 144 and associated flow lines to selectively drag fluid through the bottom tool well. One or more flow circuits can be used. For descriptive purposes, two different flow circuits are represented, but identical variations or other variations of flow circuits can be employed. Flow line 131 extends from junction 151 to flow circuit 150a. Valve 144e is provided to selectively allow fluid to flow into flow circuit 150a. The liquid can be diverted from flow line 131, passed from valve 144e to flow line 133al and 5 to the well bore through outlet port 156a. Alternatively, the fluid can be diverted from flow line 131, passed from valve 144e through flow line 133a2 to valve 144f. Pumps 136al and 136a2 can be supplied in flow lines 133al and 133a2, respectively. L0 the fluid passage through flow line 133a2 can be diverted through valve 144f to the well bore through flow line 133bl, or to valve 144g through flow line 133b2. Orna pump 136b can be positioned on flow line 133b2. 15, the fluid passing through flow line 133b2 can be passed through valves 144g to flow line 133C1 or flow line 133c2. When diverted to flow line 133cl, fluid can be passed through valve 144h to the well bore through the flow line 133dl, or backwards through the 133d2 flow line. When diverted through the flow line 133c2, the fluid is collected in the sample chamber 142a. The 133d3 damping flow line extends to the well bore and / or fluidly connects to the 133d2 flow line. The pump 136c is positioned in the flow line 133d3 to draw fluid through it. flow circuit 150b is shown to have a valve 144e- to selectively allow fluid to flow from flow line 135 in flow circuit 150b. Fluid can flow through valve 144e 'in flow line 133C1', or to flow line 133c2 'for sample chamber 142b. The fluid passing through flow line 133cl 'can be passed through valve 144g' to flow line 10 133dl 'and out of the well bore, or flow line 133d2'. The damping flow line 133d3 'extends from sample chamber 142b to the well bore and / or fluidly connects to flow line 133d2 ·. The pump 136d is positioned on the flow line 133d3 'to draw fluid through it. A variety of flow configurations can be used for the flow control circuit. For example, additional sample chambers can be included. One or more pumps can be positioned on one or more flow lines 20 along the circuit. A variety of valves and related flow lines can be provided to allow pumping and to divert fluid in the sample chambers and / or the well bore. The flow circuits can be positioned adjacent as shown in Fig. Alternatively, all or portions of the flow circuits can be positioned on the downhole tool and connected by fluid via flow lines. In some cases, the portions of the flow circuits (as well as other portions of the tool, such as the probe) can be positioned in modules that are connectable in various configurations to form the downhole tool. Multiple flow circuits can be included in a variety of locations and / or configurations. One or more flow lines can be used to connect one or more flow circuits along the downhole tool. An equalization valve 144i and associated flow line 149 are represented as being connected to Flow Line 129. One or more equalization valves can be positioned along the evaluation and / or cleaning flow lines to equalize the pressure between the flow line and the well. This equalization allows the differential depression between the inside of the tool and the well hole to be equalized, so that the tool will not be against the formation. In addition, an equalization flow line helps to ensure that the inside of the flow lines is drained of pressurized fluids and gases when they rise to the surface. This valve can exist in several positions along one or more flow nails. Multiple equalization valves can be used, particularly where pressure is anticipated to be trapped in multiple locations. Alternatively, another 5 valves 144 in the tool can be configured to automatically open to allow multiple locations to equalize the pressure. A variety of valves can be used to direct and / or control the flow of fluid through the flow lines. 10 Such valves may include check valves, check valves, flow restrictors, equalization, isolation or bypass valves and / or other devices capable of controlling the flow of fluid. The 144a-k valves can be on-off valves that selectively allow the flow of fluid through the flow line. However, they can also be valves capable of allowing a limited amount of flow to pass through them. Crossing 148 is an example of a valve that can be used to transfer the flow from the evaluation flow line 128 to the first sampling circuit and to transfer the flow from the cleaning flow line to the second sampling circuit and, in then move the sampling that flows to the second sampling circuit and the cleaning flow line to the first sampling circuit. one or more pumps can be positioned between the flow lines to manipulate the flow of fluid through it. The position of the pump can be used to assist in dragging fluid through certain portions of the downhole tool. The pumps can also be used to selectively flow the flow through one or more of the flow lines at a desired rate and / or pressure. The manipulation of the pumps can be used to assist in determining the properties of the well-bottom fluid, 10 such as pressure of the forming fluid, the mobility of the forming fluid, etc. The pumps are typically positioned in such a way that the line flow and valves can be used to manipulate fluid flow through the system. For example, one or more pumps may be upstream and / or downstream of certain valves, sample chambers, sensors, gauges or other devices. The pumps can be selectively activated and / or coordinated to drag the as desired. For example, fluid in each flow line at a pumping rate of one, the nbs Ha cleaning flow can be pump connected to the increased flow line and / or the pumping rate of a pump connected to the evaluation flow line can be decreased, in such a way that the amount of clean fluid drawn into the evaluation flow line is optimized. One or more of these pumps can also be positioned along a flow line to selectively increase the pumping rate of the fluid flowing through the flow line. One or more sensors (sometimes referred to herein as fluid monitoring devices), such as fluid analyzers 146a, b (i.e., fluid analyzers described in U.S. Patent 4,994,671) and pressure gauges 138a, b, c, can be provided. A variety of sensors can be used to determine downhole parameters, such as content, levels of contamination, chemical, (for example, percentage of a particular substance / chemical), hydromechanics (viscosity, density, percentage of certain phases, etc.), electromagnetic (for example, electrical resistance), thermal (for example, temperature), dynamic (for example, volume, mass or flow meter), optical (absorption or emission), radiological, pressure, temperature, salinity, P H, radioactivity (gamma, neutron and spectral energy), carbon content, clay composition and content, oxygen content, and / or other data on associated downhole and / or fluid conditions , among others. As described above, fluid analyzers can collect optical measurements, such as optical density. The sensor data can be collected, transmitted to the processed surface and / or downhole. Preferably, one or more of the sensors are pressure gauges 138 positioned on the evaluation flow line (138a), on the cleaning flow line (138b) or through both for the differential pressure between them (138c). Additional gauges can be positioned at various locations along the flow lines. Pressure gauges can be used to compare pressure levels in the respective flow lines, for fault detection, or for other analytical and / or diagnostic purposes. Measurement data can be collected, transmitted to the processed surface and / or downhole. This data, either alone or in combination with the sensor data, can be used to determine downhole conditions and / or decision making. One or more sample chambers can be positioned at various positions along the flow line. A single sample chamber with a piston in it is represented schematically for simplicity. However, it will be appreciated that a variety of one or more sample chambers can be used. The sample chambers can be interconnected with flow lines that extend to other sample chambers, other portions of the downhole tool, downhole and / or other loading chambers. Examples of sample chambers and related configurations can be seen in U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2003/0042021 and US Patent 6,467,544 and US 6,659,177. Preferably, the sample chambers are positioned to collect clean fluid. In addition, it is desirable to position the sample chambers for the efficient and high quality reception of clean forming fluid. Fluid from one or more of the flow lines can be collected in one or more sample chambers and / or poured into the well bore. There is no requirement that a sample chamber is included, particularly for the cleaning flow line that may contain contaminated fluid. In some cases, sample chambers and / or certain sensors, such as a fluid analyzer, can be positioned close to the probe and / or upstream of the pump. It is often beneficial to detect fluid properties from a point closer to the formation, or source of the fluid. It can also be beneficial to test and / or sample upstream of the pump. The pump typically agitates the fluid that passes through the pump. This agitation can spread contamination to pass fluid through the pump and / or increase the amount of time before a clean sample can be obtained. By testing and sampling upstream of the pump, such agitation and spreading of contamination can be avoided. computer or other processing equipment is preferably provided to selectively activate various devices in the system. The processing equipment can be used to collect, analyze, assemble, communicate, respond and / or otherwise process downhole data. The downhole tool can be adapted to perform commands in response to the processor. These commands can be used to perform 10-well operations. In operation, the downhole tool 110 (Fig, 12) is positioned adjacent to the well hole wall and the probe 118 is extended to form a seal with the well hole wall. Return pistons 119 are extended to 15 to assist in driving the downhole tool and probe in the engaged position. One or more pumps 136 in the downhole tool are selectively activated to drag the fluid in one or more flow lines (Fig. 14). The fluid is drawn into the flow lines by the pumps and directed through the flow lines desired by the valves. The pressure in the flow lines can also be manipulated using another device to increase and / or decrease the pressure in one or more flow lines. For example, the pistons in the sample and pre-test chambers can be retracted to drag fluid into them. The charge, valve, hydrostatic pressure and other techniques can also be used to manipulate the pressure in the flow lines. The flow lines in Fig. 14 can be provided with various sensors, such as fluid analyzer 146a on the evaluation flow line 128 and fluid analyzer 146b on the cleaning flow line 130. Additional sensors, 146c and 146d can also be provided at various locations along the evaluation and cleaning flow lines 131 and 135, respectively. These sensors are preferably capable of measuring fluid properties, such as optical density, or other properties, as described above. It is also preferable that these sensors are able to detect the parameters that assist in determining contamination in the respective flow lines. The sensors are preferably positioned along the flow lines such that contamination on one or more flow lines can be determined. For example, when the valves are selectively operated in such a way that the fluid in flow lines 128 and 130 passes through sensors 146a and 146b, a measurement of contamination in these separate flow lines can be determined. The fluid in the separate flow lines can be mixed or joined in a combined or fused flow line. A measurement can then be made of the properties of the fluid in such fused or combined flow lines. The fluid in flow lines 128 and 130 can be melted by diverting the fluid to a single flow line. This can be done, for example, by selectively closing certain valves, such as valves 144a and 144d, junction 151. This will divert fluid in both flow lines to flow line 135. It is also possible to obtain a measurement of fused flow line, allowing flow to probe 120 using flow line 128 or 130, instead of both. A combined or fused flow line can also be fluidly connected to one or more inlets on the probe, such that the fluid entering the tool is mixed in a single or combined flow line. It is also possible to selectively move between the merged and separate flow lines. Such switching can be done automatically or manually. It may also be possible to selectively adjust the pressures between the flow lines for relative pressure differentials between them. Fluid that passes through flow line 128 only can be measured by sensor 146a. The fluid that passes only through the flow line 130 can be measured by the sensor 146b. Flow through flow lines 128 and 130 can be manipulated to selectively allow fluid to pass through one or both flow lines. The fluid can be diverted and / or pumped through one or more flow lines adjusted to selectively change the levels of contamination and / or flow in them. In this way, the fluid passing through various sensors can be fluid from the evaluation flow line 128, cleaning flow line 130 or combinations thereof. Flow rates can also be manipulated to vary the flow across one or more of the flow lines. The fluid passing through the individual and / or fused flow lines can then be measured by sensors on the respective flow lines. For example, once melted in flow line 135, fluid can be measured by sensor 146d. Using the flow manipulation techniques described with respect to FIG. 14, the fluid can be manipulated as desired to selectively flow through sensors determined to make measurements and / or calibrate sensors. The sensors can be calibrated by selectively passing fluid through the sensors and comparison measurements. Calibration can occur simultaneously by dragging fluid on two lines simultaneously and comparing readings. Calibration can also occur sequentially by comparing readings of the same fluid as it passes through multiple sensors to verify consistent readings. Calibration can also occur by recirculating the same fluid passed through one or more sensors in a flow line. The fluid from the separate flow lines can also be compared and analyzed to detect various downhole properties. Such measurements can then be used to determine the levels of contamination in the respective flow lines. An analysis of these measurements can then be used to evaluate the properties based on the merged flow line data and flow line data on individual flow lines. A simulated molten flow line can be achieved by mathematically combining the properties of fluids from the evaluation and cleaning flow lines. By combining the measurements taken on sensors for each of the separate evaluation cleaning flow lines, a measurement of the combined or fused flow line can be determined. Thus, a fused flow line parameter can be obtained either mathematically or by actual measurement of combined fluid in a single flow line. Figs. 15A and 15B describe techniques for analyzing contamination of the fluid that passes through a downhole tool, such as the tool in Fig. 14, using a stabilization technique. Fig. 15A shows a graph of a fluid property P measured through an evaluation flow line (such as 128 in Fig. 4), a cleaning flow line (such as 130 in Fig. 4) and a line flow flow 5 (such as 135 in Fig. 4) using a stabilization technique. The molten flow line can be generated by mixing the fluid in the evaluation and cleaning flow lines, or by mathematically determining the fluid properties for a molten flow line, as described above. ] _q the graph represents the relationship between a fluid property P (y-axis) versus fluid volume (x-axis) or time (x-axis) for flow lines. The fluid property can be, for example, the optical density of the fluid that passes through the flow lines. Other fluid properties can be measured, analyzed, predicted and / or determined using methods provided here. Preferably, the volume is the total volume removed with the tool through one or more flow lines. The property of fluid P is a physical property of the fluid that distinguishes between the mud filtrate and the virgin fluid. The property shown in Fig. 15A is, for example, an optical property, such as optical density, measurable using a fluid analyzer. The mixing laws establish that the physical property P is a function of, and corresponds to, a level of contamination according to the following equation: P = cPmf + (lc) Pvf (D where Pmf is the property of the mud filtrate corresponding to a contamination level of 1 or 100% of contamination, Pvf is a virgin fluid property corresponding to a contamination level of 0 or 0% and c is the level of contamination for the fluid.The rearrangement of the equation generates the following level of contamination c for a given fluid property: c = (P - Pvf) / (Pmf-Pvf) (2) The fluid property can be graphically expressed in relation to time or volume, as shown in Fig. 15 A. In other words, the x-axis can be represented in terms of volume or time due to the known relationship of time and volume through the flow rate. In the example shown in Fig. 15A, the fluid is drawn into the evaluation flow line 128, cleaning flow line 130, and passes through sensors 146a and 146b. A fused flow line measurement can be obtained by combining the measurements made by sensors 146a and 146b, or by melting the fluid into a single flow line, for example, to flow line 135 for measurement by sensor 146d , as described above. The resulting data for the evaluation flow line, cleaning flow line and molten flow line are represented with lines 202, 204 and 206, respectively. The fluid is drawn into the flow lines from time 0, volume 0 to time tO, volume vO. Initially, the fluid property P is recorded in Pmf (mud filtrate). As described above, Pmf refers to the level of optical density, which is present when the mud filtrate is aligned with the well wall, as shown in Fig. 1. The level of contamination in Pmf is assumed to be a high level, such as about 100%. At this point A, the virgin fluid breaks through the mud cake and begins to pass through the flow lines, as shown in Fig. 2. The increase in the measurement of the fluid property is read as an increase in the property P over the Y axis. The cleaning flow line does not normally start to increase until point B at time tl and volume VI. At point B, a portion of the cleaned fluid begins to enter the cleaning flow line. Points C1-C4 show that variations in flow rates can change the measurement of fluid property in the flow line. At time t2 and volume V2, the measurement of the fluid property in the evaluation flow line shifts from C2 to Cl, and the measurement of the fluid property in the cleaning flow line shifts from C3 to C4, as the rates of flow there are displaced. In this case, the flow in the cleaning flow line 130 is increased in relation to the flow rate in the evaluation flow line 128 thus decreasing the measurement of the fluid property in the cleaning flow line, while increasing the measurement of the fluid property. in the evaluation flow line. This can, for example, show an increase in clean fluid from points C2 to Cl and a decrease in clean fluid in line 204 from points C3 to C4. Although Fig. 15A shows that a shift occurred as a specific shift in the flow rate, the flow may decrease in the cleaning line and / or increase in the flow rate in the evaluation flow line, or remain the same in both. flow lines. As the flow to the tool continues, the fluid property of the molten flow line is steadily increasing as indicated by line 206. However, the fluid property of the flow line increases. stabilization is reached at point Dl. At point Dl, the fluid property in the evaluation flow line is over, or close to, Pvf. As described above in relation to Figs, 11A-C, Pvf at point D1 is considered to be the time when only virgin fluid is passing into the evaluation flow line. In Pvf, the fluid in the evaluation flow line is assumed to be virgin, either at a contamination level of, or approaching zero. At time t3 and volume V3, the evaluation flow line is essentially drawn into the clean fluid, while the cleaning flow line is still drawn into the contaminated fluid. The measurement of fluid property in flow line 128 remains stabilized through time t4 and volume V4 at point D2. In other words, the measurement of fluid property at point D2 is approximately equal to the measurement of fluid property at point D1. From time t3 to t4 and volume V3 to V4, the fluid property in the molten and cleaning flow lines continues to increase, as shown at points E1 and E2 on line 206 and points F1 and F2 on line 204, respectively. This indicates that contamination is still flowing into the contaminated and / or molten flow lines, but that the level of contamination continues to decrease. As shown in Fig. 15B, the properties described in the graph in Fig. 15A can also be described based on derivatives of the measurements taken. Fig. 15B represents the relationship between the derived from property in fluid versus volume and time, or dP / dt. At lines of evaluation flow, cleaning, and castings are shown with lines 202a, 204a and 206a, respectively. Points A — F2 correspond to points A - F2 ', respectively. Thus, the stabilization of the evaluation flow line occurs from points D1 'to D2' in dP / dt ~ 0, and measurements of fluid properties in the molten and cleaning flow lines continue to increase from points E1. 'for E2' and Fl 'for F2', where dP / dt> 0. Although only a first-level derivative is represented, higher orders of derivatives can be used. The stabilization of the fluid properties in the evaluation flow line from points D1 to D2 can be considered as an indication that complete cleaning is achieved or approached. Stabilization can be verified by determining whether one or more additional events occurred during cleaning monitoring. Such events may include, for example, breaking through the virgin forming fluid over the cleaning and / or evaluation flow lines (points A and / or B in Fig. 15A), through the probe before stabilization (points D1 -D2 in Fig. 15A), continued variation of the fluid property in the cleaning and / or melted flow line (points El for E2 and / or F1 or F2 in Fig. 15A) and / or continued variation in the direction consistent with cleaning in the cleaning and / or molten flow line. As soon as the stabilization of the fluid property in the evaluation flow line is confirmed, cleaning can be assumed to have occurred in the evaluation flow line. Such cleaning means that a minimum level of contamination has been reached for the evaluation flow line. Typically, cleaning results in a virgin fluid that passes through the evaluation flow line. This method does not require quantification of contamination and is based, at least in part, on the qualitative detection of the signature of variation in fluid property. The graph in Fig. 15A shows that the amount of virgin fluid entering the flow lines is increasing. As contamination in the flow line is reduced, 'cleaning' occurs. In other words, more and more contaminated fluid is removed so that more virgin fluid enters the tool. In particular, cleaning occurs when the virgin fluid enters the evaluation flow line. The increase in virgin fluid is reflected as an increase in fluid properties. However, it will be appreciated that, in some cases, cleaning cannot occur due to a poor seal or other problems. In such cases where the fluid property ceases to increase, this may indicate a problem in the formation assessment process. Fig. 16 shows a graph of the relationship between a fluid property P versus time and volume using a projection technique. The fluid can be dragged to the tool using the evaluation and / or cleaning flow lines as previously described with respect to Fig. 14. Fig. 16 also shows that the selective fusion of the contamination and cleaning flow lines can be used to generate a fused flow line. As shown in Fig. 16, the fluid is drawn into the downhole tool and a fluid property in the flow line (s) is measured. The technique of Fig. 16 can be achieved by dragging fluid into a single flow line or melting into the tool during an initial IP phase, and after displacement so that the fluid is drawn into the tool using a flow line assessment and cleaning during a secondary SP phase. In one example, this is done by allowing the fluid through the evaluation flow line to generate a fused line 306, as described above in relation to Fig. 14. Alternatively, the fluid can be drawn into an evaluation flow line and a cleaning flow line to generate lines 302 and 304, respectively. A resulting fused line 306 can be generated by mathematically determining the combined contamination, or by fusing the flow lines and measuring the resulting contamination in the tool, as described above. The molten flow line can extend from the initial phase and continue to generate a 306 curve through the secondary phase. The separate cleaning and evaluation flow lines can also extend from the initial phase and continue to generate its curves 302, 304 through the secondary phase. In some cases, the separate assessment and cleaning curves can extend only through the initial phase 10 or only through the secondary phase. In some cases, the fused evaluation curve may extend only through the initial phase or only through the secondary phase. Various combinations of each of the curves can be provided. In some cases, it may be desirable to start with melting or flowing through a single flow line. In particular, it may be desirable to use single or molten flow until the breakdown of the virgin fluid occurs. This can have the beneficial effect of relieving pressure on the probe and preventing failure of the probe packer (s). Pressure differentials between flow lines can be manipulated to protect the probe, prevent cross flow, reduce contamination and / or prevent failures. This fusion of the flow lines can be achieved by manipulating the apparatus of Fig. 14 or mathematically generating the combined flow line as described above. The sensors can be used to measure a fluid property, such as optical density, and a flow rate for each of the evaluation, and / or combined cleaning flow lines. For illustrative purposes, the cleaning, evaluation and cast flow lines will be shown through both the initial and secondary phases. As shown in Fig. 16, the fluid is drawn into the tool from time 0 and volume 0 with a fluid property at Pmf. At tO and VO volume at point A, the virgin fluid breaks through the mud cake and the clean fluid begins to enter the tool. At point A, the fluid properties for the fused and evaluation flow lines begin to increase. The fluid property of the fused flow line increased through the secondary phase to a Py level at point Y as indicated by line 306. The fluid property of the evaluation flow line continues to increase through point X at a level Py and in a secondary phase, but begins to stabilize at a point D1 at, or close to, the Pvf fluid property level. The cleaning flow line remains at Pmf level until it reaches point B in time tl and volume VI. The fluid property for the cleaning flow line increases through a PZ level of fluid property at the Z point through the second phase SP. The flow rates as shown in Fig. 16 remain constant, but they can also shift as shown in the points of Cl-2 in Fig. 15A. The level of stabilization of the evaluation flow line can also be determined in Fig. 16 using the techniques described in Fig. 15 A. Fig. 17 shows a graph of the relationship between the fluid property measured in an evaluation flow line (352) and a molten flow line (356). Both flow lines start at the Pmf level indicating a high level of contamination before the break. At time tO and volume VO, identification occurs at point A and contamination levels begin to drop with increasing fluid ownership. The break through the contamination line occurs at point B at time t2 and volume V2. At time t6 and volume V6, the evaluation flow line begins to stabilize, while the combined flow line continues with a slower but steady increase. According to known techniques, the combined flow line will continue to drag some portion of the contamination fluid and reach a level of fluid property Pc below the zero contamination level of Pvf. However, the evaluation flow line will begin to approach a zero contamination level in Pvf. An estimate of Pvf and PmF can be determined using various techniques. Pmf can be determined by measuring a fluid property prior to the breakdown of virgin fluid (point A in Fig., 16). Pmf can also be estimated, for example, on the basis of empirical data or known properties, such as the specific mud used in the borehole. Pvf can be determined by a variety of methods using a fused or combined flow line. A combined flow line is created using the techniques described above with reference to Fig. 14. In one example, using the equation below under a known mixing law, for each time and / or volume, a weighted combined fluid property value Pt can be calculated: Pt = (PsQs + PgQg) / (Qs + Qg) (3) from where flow of flow Ps is the evaluation value, Pg cleaning, Qs is evaluation and Qg cleaning. The values can then be the property of the fluid is the property of fluid flow rate in the line in the in the line flow line is the rate of Pt to the flow plots in the flow line over the sampling interval to define, for example example, a line about 356 for the molten flow line. Additional information Various mixing laws that can be used to generate equation (3) or its variations are described in International PCT Application Publication WO 2005065277. Of the fluid properties represented by the 356 line, Pvf can be determined, for example, by applying contamination modeling techniques as described in P. S. Hammond, One or Two Phased Flow During fluid Sampling by a Wireline Tool, Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 6, p. 299-330 (1991). Hammond's models can then be applied using the relationship between contamination and a fluid property using equation (2). Using this application of the Hammond technique, Pvf can be estimated. Other methods, such as the curve fitting techniques described in PCT Application 00/50876, based on combined flow line properties, can also be used to determine Pvf. Once Pmf and Pvf are determined, a level of contamination for any flow line can be determined. A fluid property such as Px, Py or Pz is measured for the desired flow line at points X, Y and Z in the graph in Fig. 16. The level of contamination for each flow line can be determined based on in the properties of the molten flow line. Once Pvf and Pmf are known, and a parameter, such as Px, Py or Pz, on a given flow line is known, then the level of contamination for that flow line can be determined. For example, in order to determine a level of contamination in Px, Py or Pz, equation (2) above can be used. Fig. 18 shows a graph of the relationship between a fluid property versus time and volume using a time estimation technique. In particular, Fig. 18 refers to the estimated cleaning times generated using evaluation, cast and cleaning flow lines. The fluid can be drawn into the tool using the evaluation and / or cleaning flow lines as described previously with respect to Fig. 14. Lines 402, 404 and 406 represent the fluid property levels for the cleaning, evaluating and casting flow lines, respectively. As described with reference to Figs. 15A and 16, the fluid property for the evaluation and combined flow lines increases at point A after the virgin fluid breaks. These lines continue to increase through an initial IP 'phase. At time t6 and volume V6, the flow rates shift and the fluid property decreases rapidly from point D1 to D2 on the evaluation flow line as the flow to the evaluation flow line increases. A corresponding reduction in the flow rate in the cleaning flow line causes the cleaning line 404 to move from points D3 to D4. The assessment and cleaning flow lines then continue to increase over the second SP 'phase. In the example shown, no corresponding change is seen in the combined flow line and continues to increase steadily in the second phase SP '. As described above with reference to Figs. 15A and 16, displacement due to changes in flow rate can occur in a variety of ways or not. In some cases, such as those shown in Figs. 15A, 15B and 16, the properties of the fluids are known for a certain period of time. In some cases, the fluid property for one or more flow lines may not be known. The properties of the fluid and the corresponding line can be generated using the techniques described in relation to Fig. 16. Plots can be estimated for a future PP phase that projects fluid property estimates beyond time t7 and volume V7. It may be desirable to determine when the evaluation flow line reaches a target contamination level P T. In order to determine this, the known information about the existing flow lines and their corresponding fluid P properties can be used to predict future parameter levels. For example, the molten flow line can be projected in a future PP projection phase. The relationship between the fused and evaluation flow lines can then be used to extend a projection corresponding to line 402 to the PP projection phase using the techniques described in relation to Fig. 16. The T point at which the flow line of assessment meets a target parameter level that corresponds to a desired level of contamination can then be determined. The time to reach point T can then be determined based on the graph. The molten flow line parameter line 406 can be determined using the techniques described in relation to Figs. 16 and 17. The fused flow line parameter line 406 can be designed in the future beyond time t7 and in the projected phase PP. The evaluation line 402 can then be extended to the projected phase PP based on the projected molten flow line 406 and the relationship shown in Fig. 19. 19 Fig. 19 shows a graph of an example of a relationship between the percentage contamination of a combined flow line C M (x-axis) versus the percentage contamination of an evaluation flow line C E (y-axis). The contamination ratio in the flow lines can be determined empirically. At point J, the fluid is initially drawn into the evaluation flow line and combined. The contamination level is at 100% since the virgin fluid has not broken or is flowing to the tool. Once the virgin fluid breaks, the contamination level starts to drop to the K point. As cleaning continues, the contamination levels continue to drop until the fluid in the evaluation flow line is virgin at the L point. Cleaning continues until the amount of contaminated fluid enters the cleaning flow line continues to decrease to the M point. The graph in Fig. 19 shows a relationship between the assessment and combined flow line. This relationship can be determined using empirical data based on the relationship between the flow rate in the evaluation flow line Qs and the flow rate in the evaluation flow line Qp. The relationship can also be determined based on the properties of the rock, properties of the fluids, mud pie properties and / or previous sampling history, among others. From this relationship, line 402 for the evaluation flow line can be designed based on the projected line 406 of the combined flow line. The point at which the projected line of assessment 402 reaches the target point occurs at time tT and volume Vt. This time tT is the time to reach the target cleaning. The techniques described in relation to Figs. 15A-19 can be practiced with any of the fluid sampling systems described above. The various methods described for Figs. 15A, 15B, 16 and 18 can be interchanged. For example, the calibration procedures described here can be used in combination with any of these methods. In addition, the method of projecting and / or determining a time to reach a target contamination can be combined with the methods of Figs. 15A, 15B and / or 16. Fig. 20 illustrates a well location system 501 with which the present invention can be used to advantage. The well location system includes a surface system 502, a well bottom system 503 and a surface control unit 504. In the illustrated embodiment, a well hole 511 is formed by rotary drilling in a manner that is well known. Those of ordinary skill in the art given the advantage of this invention will appreciate, however, that the present invention also finds application in other borehole applications, other than conventional rotary drilling, and is not limited to earth-based platforms. Examples of another downhole application may involve the use of profiling cable tools (see, for example, Figs. 2 or 3), drill liners, spiral tubing, and other downhole tools. 0 bottom system well 503 includes a column in drilling 512 suspended in inland of bore well 511 with a drill 515 at its end bottom. 0 system in surface 502 includes the set in derrick and platform terrestrial 510 positioned over the , bore well 511 what penetrates an underground formation F. Set 510 includes a turntable 516, kelly 517, hook 518 and rotary turn 519. Drill column 512 is rotated by rotating table 516, energized by means not shown, which engage kelly 517 at the end top of the drill string. The drilling column 512 is suspended from a hook 518, fixed to a path block (also not shown), through the kelly 517 and rotating it 519 which allows the rotation of the drilling column in relation to the hook. The surface system also includes drilling fluid or mud 526 stored in a hole 527 formed at the well site. A pump 529 releases the drilling fluid 526 into the drilling column 512 through a port in the torneo 519, causing the drilling fluid to flow down through the drilling column 512, as indicated by directional arrow 509, the fluid drill leaves the drill column 512 through doors on drill 515 and then circulates upward through the region between the exterior of the drill column and the well hole wall, the so-called ring, as indicated by the directional arrows 532. In this way, the drilling fluid lubricates the drill bit 515 and carries forming cuts to the surface as it is returned to hole 527 for recirculation. Drill column 512 further includes a bottom composition (BHA), generally referred to as 500, close to drill bit 515 (in other words, within various drill drive lengths). The background composition includes processing, measurement and storage information capabilities, as well as communication with the surface. The BHA 500 also includes controls 630, 640, 650 to perform various other measurement functions. BHA 500 includes formation assessment set 610 for determining and communicating one or more properties of the F formation surrounding well hole 511, such as formation resistivity (or conductivity), natural radiation, density (gamma rays or neutrons), and pore pressure. The BHA also includes a lemming set 615 for communication with the surface unit 504. The telemetry set 615 includes command 650 that houses a measurement tool during drilling (MWD). The telemetry set also includes a 660 device to generate electricity for the downhole system. Although a mud pulse system is represented with a generator powered by the flow of drilling fluid 526 flowing through drilling column 512 and the MWD 650 controller, other telemetry, energy and / or battery systems can be employed. The training evaluation set 610 includes command 640 with stabilizers or ribs 714 and a probe 716 positioned on the stabilizer. The formation assessment set is used to drag the fluid onto the test tool. Probe 716 can be similar to the probe as described, for example, in Fig. 14. The flow circuit and other features of Fig. 14 can also be provided in formation assessment set 610. The probe can be positioned in a stabilizer blade as described, for example, in US Patent Application Publication US 2005/0109538. The sensors are located around the well location for data collection, preferably in real time, relating to the operation of the well site, as well as the conditions at the well site. For example, monitors, such as 506 cameras, can be provided to provide images of the operation. Sensors or surface gauges 507 are arranged on the surface systems to provide information about the surface unit, such as the pressure of the rising tubes, hook load, depth, surface torque, rpm of rotation, among others. Downhole sensors or gauges 508, can be eliminated with the drilling tool and / or well to provide information about downhole conditions, such as downhole pressure, weight in the pit, torque at the tip, direction , inclination, paste rpm, tool temperature, ring temperature and tool face, among others. Additional formation assessment sensors 609 can be positioned on formation assessment sensors to measure downhole properties. Examples of such sensors are described with reference to Fig. 14. The information collected by the sensors and / or cameras is transported to the surface system, the downhole system and / or surface control unit. The telemetry assembly 615 uses mud pulse telemetry to communicate with the surface system. The MWD 650 tool of the telemetry set 615 may include, for example, a transmitter that generates a signal, such as an acoustic or electromagnetic signal, which is representative of the measured drilling parameters. The generated signal is received on the surface by transducers (not shown), which convert the received acoustic signals to electrical signals for further processing, storage, encryption, and use according to conventional methods and systems. Communication between the surface and downhole systems is described as mud pulse telemetry, as described in U.S. Patent 5,517,464. It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that a variety of telemetry systems can be employed, such as wired drill pipes, electromagnetic or other known telemetry systems. It will be appreciated that when using other downhole tools, such as profiling cable tools, other telemetry systems, such as electromagnetic telemetry or profiling cable, can be used. 0 system of telemetry provides a call in 505 communication between the bottom system well 503 and the unity of control surface area 504. A call in additional communication 514 can be provided between the system surface 502 and the control unit of surface 504. The 503 downhole system can also communicate with the 502 surface system. The surface unit can communicate with the downhole system, directly or through the surface unit. The downhole system can also communicate with the surface unit directly or through the surface system. Communications can also move from the surface system to a remote location 604. One or more surface, remote or wellhead systems may be present. Communications can be handled through each of these locations, if necessary. The surface system can be located at or near a well location to provide an operator with information about well location conditions. The operator can be provided with a monitor that provides information about well site operations. For example, the monitor can display graphic images related to the well's production. The operator can be supplied with a control surface of the 730 system. The surface control system includes a surface processor 720 to process the data, and a surface memory 722 to store the data. The operator can also be provided with a 724 surface controller to make changes to a local well configuration to change well location operations. Based on the data received and / or an analysis of the data, the operator can manually make such adjustments. These adjustments can also be made at a remote location. In some cases, adjustments can be made automatically. The 630 controller can be supplied with a 632 downhole control set. The downhole control set includes a downhole processor for processing downhole data, and a downhole memory for store the data. A downhole controller can also be provided to selectively activate various downhole tools. The downhole control set can be used to collect, store and analyze data received from sensors at the various well locations. The downhole processor can send messages to the downhole controller to activate the tools in response to the received data. In this way, downhole operations can be automated to make adjustments in response to the analysis of downhole data, downhole controllers can also allow input and / or manual control of such adjustments by the unit. surface and / or remote control. The downhole control system can work with or separate from one or more other control systems. The pit location configuration includes tool settings and operational settings. Tool configurations can include, for example, the size of the tool shed, the type of tip, the size of the probe, the type of telemetry set, etc. Adjustments of the tool settings can be made by replacing tool components, or adjustment of the tool assembly. For example, it may be possible to select tool configurations, such as a specific probe with a predefined diameter to meet the test requirements. However, it may be necessary to replace the probe with a different diameter probe for execution, as desired. If the probe is provided with adjustable characteristics, it may be possible to adjust the diameter without replacing the probe. Operational settings can also be adjusted to meet the needs of well site operations. Operational settings can include tool settings, such as flow rates, rotation speeds, pressure settings, etc. Adjustments to operational settings can usually be made by adjusting the tool controls. For example, flow rates for the probe can be adjusted by changing the flow rate settings on pumps that conduct the flow through the sampling and contamination flow lines (see, for example, pumps 135a2, b in Fig. 14 ). In addition, it may be possible to manipulate flow through the flow lines by selectively activating certain valves and / or diverters (see, for example, diverter 148 and valves 144a-d in Fig. 14). Fig. 21 represents a method of evaluating a training. Steps 802, 804 and 806 concern a preliminary tool configuration. The preliminary tool configuration is the tool configuration used on the surface for the tool set. The tool is initially assembled according to the preliminary 802 tool configuration. Typically, the tool is configured based on an estimate of the desired tool operation. For example, to drill an 8-diameter well, an 8-diameter tip is provided. The desired tools, such as a MWD telemetry tool, a probe to carry out the formation pressure during drilling tests and a set of sensors to measure the desired parameters, are also pre-defined and mounted on the tool. Once the tool or tool portions are assembled, simulations can be performed on the surface to determine whether the tool will function as desired 804. Certain tool constraints (or operational criteria) can be predefined. The tool may be necessary to perform within these restrictions. If the tool does not meet these restrictions, adjustments to the preliminary tool configuration can be made. The process can be repeated until the tool works as desired. Once the necessary adjustments are made and the tool meets the tool restrictions, an initial tool configuration is defined for tool 806. The tool can then be sent to the bottom of the well for use 808. The tool can be positioned in the well in one or more locations as desired. Typically, in drilling operations, the tool advances into the well as the tool is drilled. However, drilling tools and / or profiling cables can be repositioned throughout the well as desired to perform various operations. As shown in block 810, the tool can be positioned to perform initial downhole tests. A variety of tests using a variety of components can be used. For example, sensors can be used to measure well parameters, such as ring pressure. In other examples, resistivity tools can be positioned to make resistivity measurements. In yet another example, the formation assessment set can be positioned and activated to drag the fluid into the downhole tool for testing and / or sampling. Test parameters can then be generated from these initial tests. The initial test parameters can be collected by the downhole processor and analyzed. This information can be stored in memory and / or combined with other well location data, compared to pre-inserted and / or otherwise analyzed information. The tool can be programmed to respond to certain data and / or output. The surface and / or downhole controllers can then activate the tool in response to this information. In some cases, the information may indicate that the initial tool configuration needs to be adjusted in response to the initial test parameters. It may be necessary to retrieve the tool to the surface and repeat steps 802-806 to adjust the initial tool configuration. The process can be repeated until the tool operates as desired. If an adjustment is necessary, the initial tool configuration is adjusted to a target test configuration that meets the requirements of 812 well bore operations. For example, the test parameters may indicate that the time for testing is limited . The test operation can then be set to work for time constraints. In another example, the flow rate through one or more probe inlets can be adjusted, adjusting the pumping rates to reduce contamination levels. Once the target test setup is established, it may be desirable to perform additional functions, such as sampling. The fluid can be drawn into the fluid and collected in a sample chamber. During this sampling process, downhole parameters can be monitored 816. The target test configuration can be adjusted as additional data is collected. Well location conditions may change, or more information may suggest that the target test configuration should be improved. Adjustments for the target test configuration can be made and a target test configuration can be defined based on monitored downhole parameters 818. Fluid samples can be collected as desired 820. A specific example of applying the method above, for the tool in Fig. 14, will now be presented. The preliminary tool configuration can be defined to provide a downhole profiling cable tool with the configuration of Fig. 14. The probe is supplied with a predefined diameter, and the tool is supplied with the valve system, sensors, pumps and sample chambers as shown. A tool simulation is performed, and it is determined that the probe diameter must be adjusted to provide the desired fluid flow to the tool during the formation fluid formation assessment. The preliminary tool configuration is then adjusted to an initial tool configuration to meet the training assessment requirements. The tool is then supplied with a probe having the desired diameter. The tool is then positioned at the bottom of the well at a location determined for records taken during drilling. The tool is activated so that the probe is implanted against the test well hole as shown in Fig. 14. The tool performs well-bottom tests according to the rates defined in the initial tool configuration. During these tests the sensors (146a b) indicate that the contamination levels are high in both the sample flow and contamination lines (128 130). To reduce contamination levels, pump rates of pump 36d are increased to drag contamination into contamination flow line 130 and away from sampling flow line 128. This change is used to adjust the flow rate ( initial tool configuration) for an increased flow rate (target test configuration) based on sensor readings (initial downhole parameters). As a result, contamination levels in the sampling flow line are reduced. The fluid parameters can be continuously monitored by the sensors as they flow through the flow lines. Since the fluid in the sampling flow line is considered to be virgin, the fluid can be collected in a sample chamber 142a. During monitoring, it may be discovered that a problem, such as a lost seal or blocked flow line, has occurred. The target test setup can be adjusted to define a refined test setup based on the data. In some cases, the tool can be reset to start new tests. Alternatively, the fluid can be fused, separated, diverted or manipulated to perform desired tests or to be dumped from the tool, When necessary, the tool can be retrieved for adjustments. Several other tools, such as MWD tools, can be activated to perform additional tests. As desired, the tool can be programmed to make the necessary adjustments automatically using pit location processors, such as pit bottom processor 632 and / or surface processor 722. The operator (at the remote site and / or surface) can also be provided with surface displays that describe configurations of well location operations. In one example, the operator may be provided with graphical representations of contamination levels. As adjustments are made in response to contamination levels, the operator can visually see shifts in operations. The operator can make additional adjustments manually to the tool configuration to achieve the desired operating levels. The operator can manually perform the adjustments, move the automatic adjustments or simply monitor the automatic adjustments. This example can also be used in a drilling operation. In cases where the formation assessment tool is on a drilling tool, the initial tool configuration can be defined in such a way that tests are performed when the tool stops and / or ends under certain conditions. The initial tool configuration can also be configured to provide limited test times and / or pre-test (s). During the monitoring of target downhole parameters, it may be necessary to terminate the operation if the seal is lost and / or the drilling tool is activated. It may also be desirable to selectively activate telemetry systems to send data to the surface. The drilling operation can also be selectively reactivated to continue advancing the drilling tool into the ground to form the well hole. In the case of a downhole tool having a probe with a sampling inlet and a contamination inlet, as shown in Fig. 14, several parameters in the downhole may be of particular interest. For example, simulations can be used to map the focused sampling tool operating regimes versus reservoir fluid mobility under different restrictions for total available energy, pumping rates out through the sample and guard production systems, the differential pressure through the inner packer for the sand face, and etc. The adjustment of the tool settings and / or pit location can be used to adjust the downhole tool in order to obtain high quality samples of forming fluid by operating a reliable and safe tool. Preferably, the adjustment can be performed in real time based on the measured parameters. Modeled parameters and / or known data can be used to provide procedures, rules and / or instructions that define the operating restrictions required for safe and reliable well site operations. For example, hardware capabilities can be modeled and implemented to define the well location configuration in relation to items such as probes, power settings, displacement units, and pumps, the software can be configured to run simulations, such as the sampling tool operation focused while pumping out. The software can also be configured to carry out closed loop operating instructions for tool control, such as pumping out for sample retrieval and tool retraction. With reference to Figs. 22A and 22B, a schematic view of a downhole tool 900 is illustrated. The downhole tool 900 may be or comprise one or more aspects of the downhole tool 10, the fluid sampling system 26, and / or probe 28 shown in Figs. 3, 5 and / or 6A-6J. The downhole tool 900 may alternatively be or comprise one or more aspects of the tool 110 and / or the fluid flow system 134 shown in Figs. 12, 13 and / or 14. In Fig. 22A, the flow patterns of the tool during production cleaning are shown. Fig. 22B illustrates the flow patterns of the tool when filling the sample chamber. The tool diagram shown in Figs. 22A and 22B is an example of a simplified tool column configuration useful for downhole sampling, among other well operations. The tool diagram is shown with the flow of sampling routing with a focus on a single pump module and cleaning and evaluation flow lines merged before the pump module. Although the tool layout shown in Figs. 22Ά and 22B have fewer components than the existing focused sampling tool, such as a single pumping versus two modules pumping into the existing focused sampling tool, the configuration shown may be attractive for the implementation of the tube focused sampling functionality drilling. It should be appreciated, however, that the tool diagram shown in Figs. 22Ά and 22B can be implemented in any downhole tool for conducting training assessment services regardless of the means transport of such downhole tools without departing from the scope of the present invention. Thus, the diagram of the tool shown in Figs. 22A and 22B can be used to obtain clean reservoir fluid and gas during sampling applications using, for example, drill pipe sampling systems (ie, reservoir sampling capabilities and / or formation assessment embedded in a column drilling systems), as well as wire rope systems. In addition, although the tool diagram shown in Fig. 22A and 22B illustrates a flow routing for clarity and / or simplicity for sampling with a simple pump module and evaluation and cleaning flow lines merged before the module pump, it should be evident to those skilled in the art, taking into account the benefit of the present invention, that three or more flow lines can be selectively fused into two or more pump modules for sampling with a focus on one system having three or more entries. Still further, the present invention also contemplates downhole sampling tools with a focus on a plurality of pump modules, a plurality of flow line in fluid communications with a corresponding one of a plurality of fluid inlets, and Fusion in two or more of the plurality in lines of flow, before in one the plurality of modules in bomb (as 5 shown, per example, in Fig. 14).As shown in Figs. 22A and 22B, an probe focused 944 extends from the downhole tool 900 for coupling to the well wall. The probe comprises one or more sealing packers with the well hole wall. The 10 packer contacts the well hole wall and forms a seal with the mud cake that lines the well hole. Probe 944 is provided with at least two inlets configured to receive fluid from formation 955. The first inlet may comprise a first flow channel 942, for example, as discussed herein. The second inlet may comprise a second flow channel 940 around the first flow channel 942, as shown, for example, in Fig. 6D. In cases where flow packers are used (as shown in Figs. 8A, 8B and / or 8C, for example), a double entry 20 for evaluation and cleaning can be incorporated into the tool instead of or in addition to the module of probe 943. The mud penetrates through the well wall and creates an invaded area over the well bore. The invaded area contains mud and other well-hole fluids that contaminate the surrounding formations, including formation 955 and a portion of the clean formation fluid contained therein. The probe 944 is in fluid communication with at least two flow lines, including an evaluation flow line 948 and a cleaning flow line 946. The evaluation flow line 948 extends from the first entry into the downhole 900 and is used to pass clean forming fluid to the downhole tool 900 for testing and / or sampling. The cleaning flow line 946 extends from the second inlet to the downhole tool 900 and is used to drag contaminated fluid away from the clean fluid flowing to the 948 evaluation flow line. Contaminated fluid can be discharged into well 950. The path of the evaluation flow line 948 and the cleaning flow line 946 in the downhole tool 900 can be adjusted using one or more routing modules, such as routing modules 912 and / or 918. In the configuration shown in Figs. 22A and 22B, each routing module 912 or 918 comprises a fluid connector for passing fluid between flow lines connected by fluid to the routing module. For example, a fluid connector may comprise direction control valves, such as valves 919a and 919b, and connector flow lines. In the example shown, direction control valves 919a and / or 919b can be implemented using two 3-port and 3-position valves. A fluid connector can also be implemented in a similar way to junction 151 and / or intersection 148 shown in Fig. 14. In the configuration shown in Figs. 22A and 22B, the fluid analyzer 921 (for example, an optical fluid analyzer) in the fluid analysis module 920 is configured to measure a fluid property in the 948 evaluation flow line, and is positioned close to the sand face (ie, the interface between formation 955 and probe 944). Depending on the work requirements, it may be more advantageous to measure the fluid property in the evaluation flow line 948 near the sample carrier module 914, such as with the fluid analyzer 917 (for example, an optical fluid analyzer), at fluid analysis module 916. This can be done, for example, by switching valves 919a and 919b in the lower routing module 918, and switching valves 929 and 925 in the fluid sample carrier module 914. As mentioned earlier, the schematic of the downhole tool 900 shown in Figs. 22Ά and 22B shows a simple pump module 910 having a pump 931, and the flow and assessment flow line fused at the point 100 of fusion 933. Both the evaluation and cleaning flow line fluids are separated or isolated on the downhole tool 900, until they intersect at the melting point 933 on the upper routing module 912 just before the pump 910. Thus, pump 931 is configured to draw fluid from formation 955 to the first and second inlets (for example, flow channels 942 and 940, respectively), and discharge at least a portion of the fluid pumped into the well hole 950. The acquisition of the fluid sample can be exercised using a sample carrier module 914 configured to obtain clean fluid samples 921 from the evaluation flow line 948. In a sampling technique according to one or more aspects of the present invention, the tool downhole well 900 is configured for sampling reverse bottom shim. In the configuration shown, the reverse bottom shim sampling is performed with the fluid sample carrier module 914 placed between the probe module 943 and the pump module 910. The evaluation flow line 948 and the first inlet (for example, flow channel 942) can communicate by fluid to a sample chamber 928 via flow line 922 and valve 929 for collecting samples 921 of forming fluid. A shut-off valve 101 923 is arranged on the evaluation flow line 948 between the first entry 942 of the probe 944 and the pump 931. The sealing valve 923 is configured to selectively divert entrained fluid from formation 955 and to the evaluation flow line 948 for the sample chamber 928. For example, the shut-off valve 923 is shown open in Fig. 22A (illustrating production cleaning) and closed in Fig. 22B (illustrating the filling of the sample chamber). The sample chamber 928 is at least partially defined by a sliding piston configured to fluidly isolate the sample 921 from a damping fluid 935 (e.g., water). Flow line 922 is selectively coupled by fluid to the first inlet and sample chamber 928 via slotted valves 926. Damping fluid 935 (eg water) can be pumped through flow line 924 and out of the back of sample chamber 928 using pump 931. By doing so, sample 921 of the forming fluid can be admitted to sample chamber 928. In the configuration shown, a relief valve 927 isolates at least partially flow line 924. For example, relief valve 927 can be used to prevent flow towards flow line 924. In addition, relief valve 927 can be used to pressurize flow line 924 with the damping fluid with a little 102 of nominal pressure, through which the damping fluid can remain in the flow line 924, while the downhole tool 900 is transported in the downhole 950. For simplicity, only a single sample chamber 928 is shown in Figs. 22A and 22B. In some cases, multiple sample chambers (bottles) are available for the sample transport module. In addition, Figs. 22A and 22B show the function of the routing module 912 as an independent module. However, its function can also or alternatively be integrated into one or other modules in the 900 tool. During production clean-up, there should be no problem with prematurely dragging the damping fluid 935 off the back of the sample chamber 928 even as a single pump module and melting lines. One of the 926 valves below the sample chamber is closed during production cleaning. Thus, the damping fluid will remain at the back of the sample chamber 928 until a first of the 926 valves is opened. However, it can be important to ensure that the pressure in the cleaning and evaluation flow lines is properly balanced or equalized during sample chamber fill operations. In the configuration shown, the differential pressure control between the lines 103 of cleaning and evaluation flow when filling the sample chamber is exercised using a pilot relief valve 927, of suitable characteristics which is arranged over the flow line 924 in the sample carrier module 914, between the back sample chamber 928 and pump 931. Special attention may be required when defining the characteristics of the relief valve 927, as well as when operating the relief valve 927 when performing focus sampling with melt flow lines, and a pump module. For example, if the crack pressure of relief valve 927 is too low and / or if relief valve 927 is omitted or bypassed, the fluid pressure at the second inlet of probe 944 may exceed the fluid pressure at the first inlet of the probe 944, for example, when the hydraulic resistance of the cleaning flow line is less than the hydraulic resistance of the cleaning flow line. In these cases, contaminated fluid can be purchased in the evaluation flow line 948 and / or in the sample chamber 928. Conversely, if the crack pressure of the relief valve 927 is too high, you may not be able to acquire fluid in the evaluation flow line 948 and / or in the sample chamber 928. Obviously, it would therefore be advantageous if the functionality or characteristics of the relief valve 927 could be modified based on the differential fluid pressure between the 104 first and second inlets and / or fluid flow rate through one or more of the first and second inlets. The ability to modify the functionality or characteristics of the 927 relief valve can facilitate the unconditional acquisition of cleanly formed fluid samples. A method of modifying the functionality or characteristics of the 927 relief valve is to selectively bypass or disconnect the 927 relief valve. A controllable single-well device can force the relief valve to open and allow the relief function to valve pressure is selectively reduced or suppressed (ie, reducing or suppressing the pressure drop generated through the valve). In the closed position, the relief valve works normally based on its cracking pressure. When the relief valve is forced into the open position, the fluid at the back of the sample chamber 92 8 can flow freely essentially through the flow line 924. For example, Figs. 22A-22B show a symbolic representation of pilot relief valve 927 including a bypass mechanism driven by an M motor. The M motor can be an electric motor. The M motor acts and mechanically drives (ie opens) the relief valve on the fluid sample carrier 914. Another important benefit of configuring the 105 tool with the flow lines fused using a single pump shown in Figs. 22A-22B is the ability to exceed the pressure of the fluid sample acquired 921. The sample's overpressurization can be used to reduce the risk of the sample reaching a phase transition point (for example, a bubble point) to the extent that the downhole tool 900 is pulled up to the Earth's surface. The overpressurization of the fluid sample 921 can be exercised, for example, once the sample 921 was captured in the sample chamber 928, closing the second among the valves of a slit 92 6. The technique may involve switching the valve 919c in the cleaning flow line 946 in the uppermost routing module 912, for example, by actuating a downhole switch. This will isolate the cleaning flow line 946 from pump 931. Once this is done, the flow generated by pump 931 is inverted, while holding sealing valve 923 on sample carrier module 914 in the closed position, and when placing the mechanically piloted relief valve 927 in the open position. Thus, the acquired fluid sample 921 can be overpressurized by pumping against the back side of the sample chamber 928. After that, the mechanically piloted relief valve 927 is placed in the closed position 106 before the downhole tool 900 is pulled up to the Earth's surface. After pulling out of the bore, sample chamber 928 is likely to be at the crack pressure of relief valve 927. Therefore, this overpressurization technique may require several pressure relief valves depending on operating parameters (such as depth sampling) - or, alternatively, an adjustable downhole relief valve. Before anything is removed, the manual valves in the 928 sample chamber are closed. Once this is done, the fluids in the sample chamber 928 are kept under pressure and the chamber can be removed from the sample carrier module 914. A disadvantage of this overpressure technique may be the reduction in the volume of compressible fluid samples such as condensed gas samples. However, it may be acceptable to reduce the sample volume slightly in order to overpressurize the sample. This technique is unique in relation to the traditional techniques currently used for superpressurizing fluid samples. There will be two fluid samples contained in each sample chamber. A first fluid sample is stored during the focused sample operation, and is contained, under pressure, on the front side of the 928 sample chamber. The second fluid (for example, 107 example, the damping fluid contaminated with the fluid from the well hole) is stored during overpressurization operations, and is contained, under pressure, on the back side of the sample chamber 928. Overpressurization of the fluid sample 921 can also be exercised, before the front side of the sample chamber 928 is isolated from the flow line 922 by closing the second of the valve of a drive 926. This alternative technique may involve switching the valve 919c on the cleaning flow line 946 on the highest routing module 912, as previously discussed, and closing valves 919a and 919b. 0 closing of valves 919a and 919b will isolate both at lines of flow toward to the module conveyor in sample 914 above of module in forwarding 918 of both flow lines in direction to probe module focusing 943 below the module in routing 918. The isolation of said flow lines makes it possible not to overpressurize the packer on probe 944 and / or not to apply pressure to formation 955. Once the switching of the previous valve is done, the sealing valve 923 on the sample carrier module 914 is opened, the mechanically piloted relief valve 927 is placed in the closed position and the flow generated by pump 931 is reversed. Thus, the acquired fluid sample 921 is superpressurized by pumping 108 against the front side of the sample chamber 928. After the sample is overpressurized, the sample chamber is isolated from the flow line 922 closing the second of the valves of a drive 926, thus capturing the overpressurized fluid 921, and the well bottom 900 and pulled upward to the Earth's surface. One of the requirements of this alternative superpressurization technique may be that the two routing modules 912 and 918 use valves capable of switching in a downhole. Fig. 23 is a flowchart diagram of a sampling method 960 with an underground formation fluid focus with a simple pump module and evaluation and cleaning flow lines fused before the pump module. It should be appreciated that the order of execution of the steps described in the flowchart of Fig. 23 can be changed and / or some of the steps described can be combined, divided, rearranged, omitted, eliminated and / or applied in other ways within the scope of this invention. In step 962, a sampling device can be lowered into an underground formation penetrated by a well bore. The sampling apparatus can be lowered using at least one of a drill string and a profiling cable, among other means 109 transporting the sampling device into the well bore. The sampling apparatus may comprise the first and second fluid inlets, a pump and a sample chamber. For example, the sampling apparatus may be of a type similar to the downhole tool 10, the fluid sampling system 26, and / or the probe 28 shown in Figs. 3, 5 and / or 6A-6J. The sampling apparatus may also be of a type similar to the downhole tool 900 shown in Figs. 22A and 22B. However, other sampling devices can be lowered for formation in step 962 within the scope of the present invention. In step 964, the fluid can be drawn from the underground formation and into the first and second inlets using the sampler pump. For example, the first inlet can be fluidly coupled to a sampling device evaluation flow line (for example, flow line 38 shown in Fig. 5 and / or flow line 948 shown in Figs. 22A- 22B). The second inlet can be fluidly coupled to the sampling apparatus cleaning flow line (for example, flow line 40 shown in Fig. 5 and / or flow line 946 shown in Figs. 22A-22B). The evaluation flow line and the cleaning flow line can be fused at a melting point before the pump (for example, pump 35 shown in Fig. 5 and / or pump 931 110 shown in Figs. 22A-22B). Thus, as previously discussed here, the pump drive can drag clean or virgin fluid from the underground formation at the first inlet, and contaminated fluid at the second inlet. In step 966, at least a portion of the fluid entrained from the formation and to the second fluid inlet can be discharged into the well bore. For example, fluid entrained from the formation and present in the pump can be discharged into the well bore. The fluid present in the pump comprises fluid drawn into the second fluid inlet regardless of whether the sampling operation is in a production cleaning or filling phase of a sample chamber. It should be noted, however, that the fluid present in the pump can also comprise fluid entrained to the first fluid inlet during the production cleaning phase (and damping fluid during the sample chamber filling phase). In step 968, a property of the fluid entrained from the formation and to the first inlet can be measured. For example, an optical density can be monitored using the analyzer analyzer measurement of which an acceptable level of contamination of the fluid entrained from optical fluid 74 shown in fcig. of fluid 921 shown in Figs. 22A 22B. Ownership in step 968 can be performed until 111 for the first fluid inlet is observed, for example, using techniques described earlier in this document. In step 970, at least a portion of the fluid entrained from the formation and to the first fluid inlet can be selectively diverted to the sample chamber of the sampling apparatus (for example, the sample chamber 42 shown in Fig. 5 and / or the sample chamber 928 shown in Figs. 22A-22B). For example, a valve (for example, valve 44 shown in Fig. 5 and / or sealing valve 923 shown in Figs. 22A-22B) disposed over the evaluation flow line between the first fluid inlet and the pump can be triggered to divert fluid to the sample chamber. In step 972, an indicative measurement of a flow rate through at least one of the first and second inlets can be performed. A measurement indicative of a pressure differential between the evaluation flow line and the cleaning flow line next to the focused probe and / or the first and second inlets can also be performed. As mentioned earlier in the description in Figs. 22A-22B, if the crack pressure of the relief valve 927 is too high, you may not be able to flow fluid in the evaluation flow line 948 and / or in the sample chamber 928 112 when pump 931 is started, because the fluid can only flow in the cleaning flow line. Thus, the measurement flow rate performed in step 972 may indicate a very low undesired flow rate for the sample chamber, conversely, if the relief valve 927 is bypassed, the fluid pressure at the inlet of the second probe 944 may exceed the fluid pressure at the first inlet of probe 944. In these cases, contaminated fluid can be acquired in the evaluation flow line 948 and / or in the sample chamber 928. Thus, the differential pressure measurement carried out in step 972 may indicate a unwanted pressure balance between the cleaning and evaluation flow line. In step 974, a pilot relief valve (for example, pilot relief valve 927 shown in Figs. 22A-22B) disposed over a flow line between the back of the sample chamber and the pump of the apparatus sampling can be triggered based on the measurements taken in step 972. For example, the pilot relief valve can be opened, if the flow rate to the sample chamber is considered too low. The pilot relief valve can also be closed if the pressure in the cleaning flow line is considered to be excessively higher than the pressure in the evaluation flow line. It should be noted that in cases where the sampling device comprises a plurality of valves 113 pilot reliefs arranged in series in between the back of the sample chamber and more of the plurality of flow relief valves to pump, one or pilot can be operated in step 974 based on the measurements made in step 972 to achieve adequate pressure equilibrium rates of adequate flow and / or in the evaluation and cleaning flow lines. The operations of step 972 and / or 974 can be repeated until the sample admitted to the sample chamber reaches a suitable volume. Then, in step 976, the fluid diverted in the sample chamber can be pressurized upwards at least one of an underground formation pressure and a well pressure. For example, the surpressurization techniques described in Figs. 22A 22B can be used to perform step 976. Method 960 optionally contemplates the capture of a plurality of sample of formation fluid, in a plurality of sample chambers, as indicated by step 978. The samples, optionally surpressurized, can be used or analyzed (not shown) since the sampling device is recovered from the well hole in step 980. In view of the above and in Figs. 1 to 4, should be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that The present invention provides an apparatus, comprising first and second inlets configured to receive formation fluid from an underground formation penetrated by a well bore, a pump configured to drag the formation fluid into the first and second inlets and the discharge in the well bore of at least a portion of the formation fluid dragged to the second inlet, and a sample chamber in fluid communication with the first selective inlet. The apparatus may further comprise a fluid 10 connector configured to selectively establish a fluid connection between at least one of the first and second ports and the pump. The first inlet may comprise a first flow channel, and the second inlet may comprise a second flow channel around the first flow channel. The apparatus may further comprise a flow line in fluid communication with the first inlet and the pump, and a valve arranged in the flow line between the first inlet and the pump, and configured to selectively divert fluid from the formation drawn into the flow line 20 to the sample chamber. The apparatus may further comprise a fluid analyzer configured to measure a property of a formation fluid drawn into the flow line. The fluid analyzer may comprise an optical fluid analyzer. The flow line can be a 115 first flow line, and the apparatus may further comprise a second flow line in fluid communication with the second inlet and the pump. The second flow line can still be in fluid communication with the first flow line at a melting point. The apparatus may further comprise a first flow line in fluid communication with the first inlet and the sample chamber, and a second flow line in fluid communication with a back side of the sample chamber and with the pump. The apparatus may further comprise a pilot relief valve arranged on the second flow line between the rear side of the sample chamber and the pump. The pump can be configured to pressurize the sample chamber by pumping fluid through the pilot relief valve. 15 the present invention also provides a method which comprises positioning a device in a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation, the apparatus comprising first and second fluid inlets, a pump, and a sample chamber, drag fluid 20 formation of the underground formation and for the first and second fluid inlets using the pump, unloading into the well bore of at least a portion of the formation fluid drawn into the second fluid inlet, and selectively bypassing at least a portion of the 116 formation dragged to the first fluid inlet to the sample chamber. The selective diversion of at least the portion of the formation fluid entrained to the first inlet into the sample chamber comprises the actuation of a valve arranged on a flow line between the first fluid inlet and the pump. The method may further comprise measuring a property of the formation fluid entrained to the first fluid inlet. The measurement of the property of the forming fluid may comprise a measurement of the optical density. The method may further comprise the actuation of a pilot relief valve arranged on a flow line between a back of the sample chamber and the pump. The pilot relief valve can be operated based on a measurement indicating a pressure differential between a first flow line that is coupled by fluid to the first fluid inlet, and a second flow line coupled by fluid, that is the second fluid inlet. The pilot relief valve can be actuated on the basis of an indicative measurement of a flow rate through at least one of the first and second fluid inlets. The method may further comprise pressurizing at least a portion of the formation fluid diverted to the sample chamber above at least one of an underground formation pressure and a 117 well bore pressure. The positioning of the device in the well hole that penetrates the underground formation can be carried out using at least one of a drilling column and a profiling cable. It will be understood from the previous description that various modifications and changes can be made in the preferred and alternative modalities of the present invention without departing from its true spirit. The devices included in this document can be manually and / or automatically activated to perform the desired operation. Activation can be performed as desired and / or based on data generated, conditions detected and / or analysis of the results of downhole operations. This description is intended for illustration purposes only and should not be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of this invention should be determined only by the language of the claims that follow. The term comprising for the claims is intended to mean, including at least in such a way that the recited listing of elements in a claim is an open group. One, one, o, a and other singular terms are intended to include the plural of the same, unless specifically excluded. It should also be understood that the discussion and several 118 examples of methods and techniques described above do not need to include all the details or features described above. In addition, neither the methods described above, nor any methods that may fall within the scope of any of the attached claims, need to be carried out in any particular order. The methods of the present invention do not require the use of the particular modalities represented and described in the present specification, such as, for example, the exemplary probe 28 of FIG. 5, but are equally applicable with any other suitable structure, shape and configuration of the components. The preferred embodiments of the present invention are, therefore, well adapted for realizing one or more of the objects of the present invention. In addition, the apparatus and methods for the advantages of the present invention offer additional capabilities, functions, methods, uses and applications over the prior art that have not been specifically addressed here, but are, or will become apparent, from the description here, of the attached drawings and claims. The foregoing describes features of various embodiments so that those skilled in the art can better understand aspects of the present invention. Those skilled in the art should understand that they can easily use the present invention as a basis for design or 119 modification of other processes and structures to achieve the same purposes and / or achieve the same advantages as the modalities introduced here. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present description, and that they can make various changes, substitutions and alterations here without departing from the spirit and scope of the present description.
权利要求:
Claims (2) [1] 1/21 [2] 2/21
类似技术:
公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题 BR112012018101B1|2020-04-22|apparatus and method for evaluating underground formations with selective fluid communication US8555968B2|2013-10-15|Formation evaluation system and method US8726988B2|2014-05-20|Focused sampling of formation fluids AU2006204626B2|2009-04-30|Formation evaluation system and method CA2918898C|2018-01-16|Methods and systems for evaluation of rock permeability, porosity, and fluid composition RU2404361C2|2010-11-20|Well drilling tool, tool for evaluation of parametres of formation and evaluation method of parametres of formation by means of well tool US9303510B2|2016-04-05|Downhole fluid analysis methods US8905128B2|2014-12-09|Valve assembly employable with a downhole tool US10480316B2|2019-11-19|Downhole fluid analysis methods for determining viscosity US20140224511A1|2014-08-14|Pump Drain Arrangements For Packer Systems And Methods For Sampling Underground Formations Using Same EP2706191A2|2014-03-12|Minimization of contaminants in a sample chamber US20160177713A1|2016-06-23|Realtime downhole sample volume collection US20210131283A1|2021-05-06|Focused Formation Sampling Method and Apparatus GB2450436A|2008-12-24|A method of evaluating a fluid from a subterranean formation MXPA06009982A|2007-03-21|Formation evaluation system and method. MXPA06005494A|2007-04-10|Apparatus and method for obtaining downhole samples
同族专利:
公开号 | 公开日 GB2489866B|2015-12-23| WO2011090868A2|2011-07-28| US8210260B2|2012-07-03| US20100175873A1|2010-07-15| US20130075088A1|2013-03-28| GB201212907D0|2012-09-05| WO2011090868A3|2011-10-06| BR112012018101A2|2018-06-05| US9303509B2|2016-04-05| GB2489866A|2012-10-10|
引用文献:
公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题 US3121459A|1960-07-15|1964-02-18|Schlumberger Well Surv Corp|Formation testing systems| US3323361A|1963-08-13|1967-06-06|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Methods and apparatus for analyzing well production| US3352361A|1965-03-08|1967-11-14|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Formation fluid-sampling apparatus| US3295615A|1965-10-22|1967-01-03|Schlumberger Well Surv Corp|Formation-testing apparatus| US3385364A|1966-06-13|1968-05-28|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Formation fluid-sampling apparatus| US3430181A|1966-10-03|1969-02-25|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Electrical and fluid line coupling apparatus for connecting well tool sections| US3430711A|1967-12-11|1969-03-04|Harriet A Taggart|Casing perforating and screen plug setting device| US3565169A|1969-04-02|1971-02-23|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Formation-sampling apparatus| US3530933A|1969-04-02|1970-09-29|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Formation-sampling apparatus| US3611799A|1969-10-01|1971-10-12|Dresser Ind|Multiple chamber earth formation fluid sampler| US3653436A|1970-03-18|1972-04-04|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Formation-sampling apparatus| US3677081A|1971-06-16|1972-07-18|Amoco Prod Co|Sidewall well-formation fluid sampler| US3813936A|1972-12-08|1974-06-04|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Methods and apparatus for testing earth formations| US3782191A|1972-12-08|1974-01-01|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Apparatus for testing earth formations| US3924463A|1973-10-18|1975-12-09|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Apparatus for testing earth formations composed of particles of various sizes| US3864970A|1973-10-18|1975-02-11|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Methods and apparatus for testing earth formations composed of particles of various sizes| US3859851A|1973-12-12|1975-01-14|Schlumberger Technology Corp|Methods and apparatus for testing earth formations| US3952588A|1975-01-22|1976-04-27|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus for testing earth formations| US3934468A|1975-01-22|1976-01-27|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Formation-testing apparatus| US4287946A|1978-05-22|1981-09-08|Brieger Emmet F|Formation testers| US4339948A|1980-04-25|1982-07-20|Gearhart Industries, Inc.|Well formation test-treat-test apparatus and method| US4246782A|1980-05-05|1981-01-27|Gearhart-Owen Industries, Inc.|Tool for testing earth formations in boreholes| US4369654A|1980-12-23|1983-01-25|Hallmark Bobby J|Selective earth formation testing through well casing| US4392376A|1981-03-31|1983-07-12|S-Cubed|Method and apparatus for monitoring borehole conditions| US4492862A|1981-08-07|1985-01-08|Mathematical Sciences Northwest, Inc.|Method and apparatus for analyzing components of hydrocarbon gases recovered from oil, natural gas and coal drilling operations| US4416152A|1981-10-09|1983-11-22|Dresser Industries, Inc.|Formation fluid testing and sampling apparatus| US4635717A|1984-06-08|1987-01-13|Amoco Corporation|Method and apparatus for obtaining selected samples of formation fluids| US4535843A|1982-05-21|1985-08-20|Standard Oil Company |Method and apparatus for obtaining selected samples of formation fluids| US4470456A|1983-02-22|1984-09-11|Moutray Iii Waldo W|Borehole sampling tool| US4513612A|1983-06-27|1985-04-30|Halliburton Company|Multiple flow rate formation testing device and method| US4573532A|1984-09-14|1986-03-04|Amoco Corporation|Jacquard fluid controller for a fluid sampler and tester| US4680581A|1985-03-28|1987-07-14|Honeywell Inc.|Local area network special function frames| US4931343A|1985-07-31|1990-06-05|Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company|Sheet material used to form portions of fasteners| US4690216A|1986-07-29|1987-09-01|Shell Offshore Inc.|Formation fluid sampler| US4994671A|1987-12-23|1991-02-19|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus and method for analyzing the composition of formation fluids| US4879900A|1988-07-05|1989-11-14|Halliburton Logging Services, Inc.|Hydraulic system in formation test tools having a hydraulic pad pressure priority system and high speed extension of the setting pistons| US4860581A|1988-09-23|1989-08-29|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Down hole tool for determination of formation properties| US4936139A|1988-09-23|1990-06-26|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Down hole method for determination of formation properties| US4951749A|1989-05-23|1990-08-28|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Earth formation sampling and testing method and apparatus with improved filter means| FR2647828B1|1989-06-06|1991-08-30|Soletanche|METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TAKING OFF CONCRETE TO WHICH IT ADHESDS, AN END JOINT OF A WALL PANEL MOLDED IN THE GROUND| US5166747A|1990-06-01|1992-11-24|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus and method for analyzing the composition of formation fluids| US5230244A|1990-06-28|1993-07-27|Halliburton Logging Services, Inc.|Formation flush pump system for use in a wireline formation test tool| DK225290D0|1990-09-19|1990-09-19|Kurt I Soerensen|PROCEDURE AND APPARATUS FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYZING LEVEL-TESTED SAMPLES OF POREGAS / LIQUIDS FROM AN UNDERGROUND FORMATION| US5265015A|1991-06-27|1993-11-23|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Determining horizontal and/or vertical permeability of an earth formation| US5279153A|1991-08-30|1994-01-18|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus for determining horizontal and/or vertical permeability of an earth formation| US5335542A|1991-09-17|1994-08-09|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Integrated permeability measurement and resistivity imaging tool| US5587525A|1992-06-19|1996-12-24|Western Atlas International, Inc.|Formation fluid flow rate determination method and apparatus for electric wireline formation testing tools| US5331156A|1992-10-01|1994-07-19|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method of analyzing oil and water fractions in a flow stream| US5266800A|1992-10-01|1993-11-30|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method of distinguishing between crude oils| SE500577C2|1992-11-04|1994-07-18|Perstorp Ab|Plastic lid with associated plastic box| US5377755A|1992-11-16|1995-01-03|Western Atlas International, Inc.|Method and apparatus for acquiring and processing subsurface samples of connate fluid| US5303775A|1992-11-16|1994-04-19|Western Atlas International, Inc.|Method and apparatus for acquiring and processing subsurface samples of connate fluid| US5517464A|1994-05-04|1996-05-14|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Integrated modulator and turbine-generator for a measurement while drilling tool| US5540280A|1994-08-15|1996-07-30|Halliburton Company|Early evaluation system| WO1996029616A1|1995-03-20|1996-09-26|Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.|Determining a parameter of a component in a composition| AU5379196A|1995-03-31|1996-10-16|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Formation isolation and testing apparatus and method| US6157893A|1995-03-31|2000-12-05|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Modified formation testing apparatus and method| US5622223A|1995-09-01|1997-04-22|Haliburton Company|Apparatus and method for retrieving formation fluid samples utilizing differential pressure measurements| EP0781893B8|1995-12-26|2007-02-14|HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, Inc.|Apparatus and method for early evaluation and servicing of a well| US5770798A|1996-02-09|1998-06-23|Western Atlas International, Inc.|Variable diameter probe for detecting formation damage| US5741962A|1996-04-05|1998-04-21|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Apparatus and method for analyzing a retrieving formation fluid utilizing acoustic measurements| US5934374A|1996-08-01|1999-08-10|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Formation tester with improved sample collection system| US5765637A|1996-11-14|1998-06-16|Gas Research Institute|Multiple test cased hole formation tester with in-line perforation, sampling and hole resealing means| US5826662A|1997-02-03|1998-10-27|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Apparatus for testing and sampling open-hole oil and gas wells| US5859430A|1997-04-10|1999-01-12|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method and apparatus for the downhole compositional analysis of formation gases| US6176323B1|1997-06-27|2001-01-23|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Drilling systems with sensors for determining properties of drilling fluid downhole| US5939717A|1998-01-29|1999-08-17|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Methods and apparatus for determining gas-oil ratio in a geological formation through the use of spectroscopy| US6627873B2|1998-04-23|2003-09-30|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Down hole gas analyzer method and apparatus| US6178815B1|1998-07-30|2001-01-30|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method to improve the quality of a formation fluid sample| US6343507B1|1998-07-30|2002-02-05|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method to improve the quality of a formation fluid sample| US6230557B1|1998-08-04|2001-05-15|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Formation pressure measurement while drilling utilizing a non-rotating sleeve| GB9821052D0|1998-09-28|1998-11-18|Ricardo Consulting Eng|Direct injection gasoline engines| US6164126A|1998-10-15|2000-12-26|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Earth formation pressure measurement with penetrating probe| GB2344365B|1998-12-03|2001-01-03|Schlumberger Ltd|Downhole sampling tool and method| US6301959B1|1999-01-26|2001-10-16|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Focused formation fluid sampling probe| DE29902257U1|1999-02-09|2000-08-10|Diehl Stiftung & Co|Electronic stove timer| US6350986B1|1999-02-23|2002-02-26|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Analysis of downhole OBM-contaminated formation fluid| US6274865B1|1999-02-23|2001-08-14|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Analysis of downhole OBM-contaminated formation fluid| US6688390B2|1999-03-25|2004-02-10|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Formation fluid sampling apparatus and method| US6325146B1|1999-03-31|2001-12-04|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Methods of downhole testing subterranean formations and associated apparatus therefor| US7096976B2|1999-11-05|2006-08-29|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Drilling formation tester, apparatus and methods of testing and monitoring status of tester| US6507401B1|1999-12-02|2003-01-14|Aps Technology, Inc.|Apparatus and method for analyzing fluids| US6672163B2|2000-03-14|2004-01-06|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Acoustic sensor for fluid characterization| US6435279B1|2000-04-10|2002-08-20|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Method and apparatus for sampling fluids from a wellbore| US6437326B1|2000-06-27|2002-08-20|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Permanent optical sensor downhole fluid analysis systems| CA2385376C|2000-07-20|2005-04-05|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Drawdown apparatus and method for in-situ analysis of formation fluids| GB2373060B|2000-07-20|2003-10-15|Baker Hughes Inc|Method for fast and extensive formation evaluation| US6478096B1|2000-07-21|2002-11-12|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Apparatus and method for formation testing while drilling with minimum system volume| US20040099443A1|2000-07-21|2004-05-27|Baker Hughes, Incorporated|Apparatus and methods for sampling and testing a formation fluid| US6871713B2|2000-07-21|2005-03-29|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Apparatus and methods for sampling and testing a formation fluid| WO2002014652A1|2000-08-15|2002-02-21|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Formation testing apparatus with axially and spirally mounted ports| US6476384B1|2000-10-10|2002-11-05|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Methods and apparatus for downhole fluids analysis| US6474152B1|2000-11-02|2002-11-05|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Methods and apparatus for optically measuring fluid compressibility downhole| US6659177B2|2000-11-14|2003-12-09|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Reduced contamination sampling| NO312264B1|2000-11-14|2002-04-15|Nammo Raufoss As|Pyrotechnic charge structure| US6668924B2|2000-11-14|2003-12-30|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Reduced contamination sampling| US6467544B1|2000-11-14|2002-10-22|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Sample chamber with dead volume flushing| US6415864B1|2000-11-30|2002-07-09|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|System and method for separately producing water and oil from a reservoir| EG22935A|2001-01-18|2003-11-29|Shell Int Research|Retrieving a sample of formation fluid in a case hole| US6722432B2|2001-01-29|2004-04-20|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Slimhole fluid tester| US6622554B2|2001-06-04|2003-09-23|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Open hole formation testing| US6769296B2|2001-06-13|2004-08-03|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus and method for measuring formation pressure using a nozzle| US6729399B2|2001-11-26|2004-05-04|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method and apparatus for determining reservoir characteristics| US6729400B2|2001-11-28|2004-05-04|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method for validating a downhole connate water sample| US6658930B2|2002-02-04|2003-12-09|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Metal pad for downhole formation testing| US6714872B2|2002-02-27|2004-03-30|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Method and apparatus for quantifying progress of sample clean up with curve fitting| US7080552B2|2002-05-17|2006-07-25|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Method and apparatus for MWD formation testing| US6719049B2|2002-05-23|2004-04-13|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Fluid sampling methods and apparatus for use in boreholes| US6964301B2|2002-06-28|2005-11-15|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method and apparatus for subsurface fluid sampling| US7178591B2|2004-08-31|2007-02-20|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus and method for formation evaluation| US6745835B2|2002-08-01|2004-06-08|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method and apparatus for pressure controlled downhole sampling| CA2497295C|2002-08-27|2009-12-15|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Single phase sampling apparatus and method| US7152466B2|2002-11-01|2006-12-26|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Methods and apparatus for rapidly measuring pressure in earth formations| US7128144B2|2003-03-07|2006-10-31|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Formation testing and sampling apparatus and methods| RU2349751C2|2003-03-10|2009-03-20|Бейкер Хьюз Инкорпорейтед|Method and device for control over quality of fluid pumping-out by means of analysis of rate of fluid inflow from rock| US6905241B2|2003-03-13|2005-06-14|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Determination of virgin formation temperature| US7173239B2|2003-03-14|2007-02-06|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Method and apparatus for downhole quantification of methane using near infrared spectroscopy| US6956204B2|2003-03-27|2005-10-18|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Determining fluid properties from fluid analyzer| US7178392B2|2003-08-20|2007-02-20|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Determining the pressure of formation fluid in earth formations surrounding a borehole| US7114562B2|2003-11-24|2006-10-03|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus and method for acquiring information while drilling| US20050216196A1|2003-12-24|2005-09-29|Ridvan Akkurt|Contamination estimation using fluid analysis models| US20050182566A1|2004-01-14|2005-08-18|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Method and apparatus for determining filtrate contamination from density measurements| US7031841B2|2004-01-30|2006-04-18|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method for determining pressure of earth formations| US7458419B2|2004-10-07|2008-12-02|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus and method for formation evaluation| US7263881B2|2004-12-08|2007-09-04|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Single probe downhole sampling apparatus and method| US7458252B2|2005-04-29|2008-12-02|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Fluid analysis method and apparatus| US7878244B2|2006-12-28|2011-02-01|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Apparatus and methods to perform focused sampling of reservoir fluid|US8584519B2|2010-07-19|2013-11-19|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Communication through an enclosure of a line| CA2821899C|2010-12-23|2017-01-17|Schlumberger Canada Limited|Sampling tool with dual flowline architecture| EP2661540A2|2011-01-06|2013-11-13|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Downhole formation fluid contamination assessment| MX337924B|2011-01-28|2016-03-28|Halliburton Energy Services Inc|Method and apparatus for evaluating fluid sample contamination by using multi sensors.| US9139454B2|2011-02-25|2015-09-22|En-Spire Technologies, Llc|Turbulence inducing device and methods of use| WO2013033547A1|2011-09-01|2013-03-07|Schlumberger Canada Limited|Sample capture prioritization| US20140069640A1|2012-09-11|2014-03-13|Yoshitake Yajima|Minimization of contaminants in a sample chamber| US9823373B2|2012-11-08|2017-11-21|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Acoustic telemetry with distributed acoustic sensing system| US9416657B2|2012-11-15|2016-08-16|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Dual flowline testing tool with pressure self-equalizer| US9322267B2|2012-12-18|2016-04-26|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Downhole sampling of compressible fluids| US9115571B2|2012-12-20|2015-08-25|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Packer including support member with rigid segments| US9382793B2|2012-12-20|2016-07-05|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Probe packer including rigid intermediate containment ring| US9790789B2|2012-12-21|2017-10-17|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Apparatus and method for obtaining formation fluid samples| US9284838B2|2013-02-14|2016-03-15|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Apparatus and method for obtaining formation fluid samples utilizing independently controlled devices on a common hydraulic line| US9752432B2|2013-09-10|2017-09-05|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Method of formation evaluation with cleanup confirmation| US10415380B2|2013-10-01|2019-09-17|Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc|Sample tank with integrated fluid separation| US20150135816A1|2013-11-20|2015-05-21|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Water Line Control For Sample Bottle Filling| US10215022B2|2013-12-19|2019-02-26|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Guard filtering system for focused sampling probe| US10577928B2|2014-01-27|2020-03-03|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Flow regime identification with filtrate contamination monitoring| US10858935B2|2014-01-27|2020-12-08|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Flow regime identification with filtrate contamination monitoring| US9822776B2|2014-08-20|2017-11-21|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Detecting and compensating for the effects of pump half-stroking| US10544673B2|2014-09-10|2020-01-28|Fracture ID, Inc.|Apparatus and method using measurements taken while drilling cement to obtain absolute values of mechanical rock properties along a borehole| BR112017021954A2|2015-04-15|2018-07-10|Statoil Petroleum As|calibration of in-line monitoring instruments in an underwater installation| US10585082B2|2015-04-30|2020-03-10|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Downhole filtrate contamination monitoring| WO2017015340A1|2015-07-20|2017-01-26|Pietro Fiorentini Spa|Systems and methods for monitoring changes in a formation while dynamically flowing fluids| US10753172B2|2016-11-04|2020-08-25|Schlumberger Technology Corporation|Downhole formation testing tools including improved flow routing device| WO2018111281A1|2016-12-15|2018-06-21|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Contamination estimation of formation samples| US10502009B2|2017-02-16|2019-12-10|Saudi Arabian Oil Company|Smart selective drilling fluid system| US20190234211A1|2018-02-01|2019-08-01|Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc|Formation fluid sampling module| BR102018075029A2|2018-12-03|2020-06-16|Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras|SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF ANAL SPACE SEALING IN FLEXIBLE DUCTS| US11098558B2|2019-05-29|2021-08-24|Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc|Injection valve arrangement with switched bypass and method| US11156085B2|2019-10-01|2021-10-26|Saudi Arabian Oil Company|System and method for sampling formation fluid| US11125083B2|2019-10-31|2021-09-21|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Focused formation sampling method and apparatus|
法律状态:
2019-01-08| B06F| Objections, documents and/or translations needed after an examination request according art. 34 industrial property law| 2019-05-28| B06T| Formal requirements before examination| 2019-10-22| B07A| Technical examination (opinion): publication of technical examination (opinion)| 2020-02-11| B09A| Decision: intention to grant| 2020-04-22| B16A| Patent or certificate of addition of invention granted|Free format text: PRAZO DE VALIDADE: 20 (VINTE) ANOS CONTADOS A PARTIR DE 13/01/2011, OBSERVADAS AS CONDICOES LEGAIS. |
优先权:
[返回顶部]
申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题 US12/690,231|US8210260B2|2002-06-28|2010-01-20|Single pump focused sampling| PCT/US2011/021048|WO2011090868A2|2010-01-20|2011-01-13|Single pump focused sampling| 相关专利
Sulfonates, polymers, resist compositions and patterning process
Washing machine
Washing machine
Device for fixture finishing and tension adjusting of membrane
Structure for Equipping Band in a Plane Cathode Ray Tube
Process for preparation of 7 alpha-carboxyl 9, 11-epoxy steroids and intermediates useful therein an
国家/地区
|